Back to Search Start Over

Precipitation methods for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement compared, and final evaluation under routine operating conditions of a method with a low sample-to-reagent ratio

Authors :
H. Baadenhuijsen
Pierre N.M. Demacker
Marja Hessels
Helga Toenhake-Dijkstra
Source :
Clinical Chemistry, 43, 663-668, Clinical Chemistry, 43, 4, pp. 663-668
Publication Year :
1997

Abstract

We evaluated six precipitation methods for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-chol) determination: the heparin/Mn2+precipitation reagent method (Hep), two variants of the phosphotungstic acid/Mg2+ method (Tung-L and Tung-B), the dextran sulfate 50 000/Mg2+ method (Dex), the PEG 6000 method (PEG), and the PEG 6000/dextran sulfate 15 000 (PEG/Dex) method. The Tung-B and PEG/Dex precipitation methods have a low sample/precipitation reagent volume ratio (16.4 mmol/L (undiluted sample) or >28.0 mmol/L (sample diluted twofold); however, ultrafiltration without dilution was the most accurate method. Results of Tung-B under routine conditions (33 technicians) agreed well with those of the PEG method for 406 normo- and hyperlipidemic plasma samples. By comparison with the HDL-chol method from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Tung-B method showed a total error of 10.6%, which fulfills the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program for HDL-chol analysis. In conclusion, with motivated personnel, Tung-B is a reliable, cost-effective method for routine HDL-chol analysis.

Details

ISSN :
00099147
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Chemistry, 43, 663-668, Clinical Chemistry, 43, 4, pp. 663-668
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....33b7c3d41b9563f81419cd40e53d359c