Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups

Authors :
Hiroshi Horiuchi
Keiji Tensho
Hiroki Shimodaira
Suguru Koyama
Tomoya Iwaasa
Jun Takahashi
Naoto Saito
Source :
Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology, Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology, Vol 25, Iss, Pp 22-29 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society, 2021.

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to verify the effects of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for postoperative clinical scores, anterior stability and frequency of complications compared to remnant removal and cases with remnant defects. Methods The 105 patients who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into three groups. If the remnant was a Crain I-III type, remnant-preserving bone tunnel creation was attempted. After the creation of the bone tunnel, good continuity was maintained in 34 patients (preserved group). Due to lost continuity, the remnant was resected in 26 patients (resected group). No identifiable remnant continuity remained (Crain IV) in 45 patients (absent group). The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, anterior stability measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer at 2 years postoperatively, and frequency of complications were compared among the three groups. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to clarify the factors affecting postoperative anterior stability. Results The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, IKDC subjective score, and frequency of complications were not significantly different among the groups. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior stability was significantly better in the preserved group (0.3 ± 1.6 mm) compared to the resected group (1.6 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.003) and absent group (1.6 mm ± 1.7, p = 0.009). The multiple linear regression analysis showed remnant preservation significantly related to postoperative anterior stability. Conclusion Although there were no differences in clinical scores, the ACL reconstruction with new preservation technique showed good anterior stability and no difference in the frequency of complications.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22146873
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....33aeb36716644ce38cc410e9b25254a0