Back to Search Start Over

New Markers for Transplant Rejection

Authors :
Hassan Argani
Source :
Experimental and Clinical Transplantation. 18:1-9
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Baskent University, 2020.

Abstract

Monitoring allograft function after kidney transplant has routinely relied on the use of nonspecific markers, such as serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and donor-specific antibodies. These traditional markers have low sensitivity and fail to detect subclinical changes. Diagnosis of renal allograft dysfunction still requires an allograft biopsy, as it remains the criterion standard for assessment of graft status. However, renal biopsy is an invasive procedure, and sampling errors may result in misdiagnosis, perhaps causing graft failure. New biomarkers have been developed to monitor allograft function, although many are not yet routinely used. Other shortcomings, such as lack of standardization and high cost, should be solved before their widespread application in the clinic. A recipient's immune status could be monitored by use of urine or blood samples. These include functional cell-based assays and the evaluation of molecular expression at the messenger RNA or protein levels. Molecular technologies, including molecular microscope diagnostic systems, have been recently developed to improve the yield of histologic evaluation of the allograft biopsy. Prospective, interventional trials are required to demonstrate whether these new biomarkers improve patient or transplant outcomes. Implementation of these technologies into standard clinical practice remains challenging until their generalizability, cost, ease of interpretation, and the identification of patients who may benefit from more than standard-of-care surveillance can be determined. These biomarkers could allow immunosuppressive therapy to be individualized for patients.

Details

ISSN :
21468427 and 13040855
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Experimental and Clinical Transplantation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....32f2b7c5daaa4d811055ee67ed1a48ff
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.tond-tdtd2019.l6