Back to Search Start Over

Global model simulations of air pollution during the 2003 European heat wave

Authors :
Gilles Athier
P. Moinat
Johannes Flemming
Antje Inness
Arjo Segers
M. van Weele
Jean-Pierre Cammas
O. Stein
Vincent Huijnen
Christos Zerefos
N. Elguindi
Martin G. Schultz
Valérie Thouret
Vincent-Henri Peuch
Carlos Ordóñez
Eleni Katragkou
Harald Flentje
Laboratoire d'aérologie (LAERO)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
Deutscher Wetterdienst [Offenbach] (DWD)
Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique (CERFACS)
CERFACS
Groupe d'étude de l'atmosphère météorologique (CNRM-GAME)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA)
Institute for Chemistry and Dynamics of the Geosphere (ICG), FZ Jülich, Germany
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France
Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
ResearcherID, Atmospheric chemistry and physics / Discussions 9, 16853-16911 (2009)., Scopus-Elsevier, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, European Geosciences Union, 2010, 10 (2), pp.789-815. ⟨10.5194/acp-10-789-2010⟩, Atmospheric chemistry and physics 10, 789-815 (2010)., Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 789-815 (2010), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10 (2), pp.789-815. ⟨10.5194/acp-10-789-2010⟩
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
Copernicus GmbH, 2010.

Abstract

Three global Chemistry Transport Models – MOZART, MOCAGE, and TM5 – as well as MOZART coupled to the IFS meteorological model including assimilation of ozone (O3) and carbon monoxide (CO) satellite column retrievals, have been compared to surface measurements and MOZAIC vertical profiles in the troposphere over Western/Central Europe for summer 2003. The models reproduce the meteorological features and enhancement of pollution during the period 2–14 August, but not fully the ozone and CO mixing ratios measured during that episode. Modified normalised mean biases are around −25% (except ~5% for MOCAGE) in the case of ozone and from −80% to −30% for CO in the boundary layer above Frankfurt. The coupling and assimilation of CO columns from MOPITT overcomes some of the deficiencies in the treatment of transport, chemistry and emissions in MOZART, reducing the negative biases to around 20%. The high reactivity and small dry deposition velocities in MOCAGE seem to be responsible for the overestimation of O3 in this model. Results from sensitivity simulations indicate that an increase of the horizontal resolution to around 1°×1° and potential uncertainties in European anthropogenic emissions or in long-range transport of pollution cannot completely account for the underestimation of CO and O3 found for most models. A process-oriented TM5 sensitivity simulation where soil wetness was reduced results in a decrease in dry deposition fluxes and a subsequent ozone increase larger than the ozone changes due to the previous sensitivity runs. However this latest simulation still underestimates ozone during the heat wave and overestimates it outside that period. Most probably, a combination of the mentioned factors together with underrepresented biogenic emissions in the models, uncertainties in the modelling of vertical/horizontal transport processes in the proximity of the boundary layer as well as limitations of the chemistry schemes are responsible for the underestimation of ozone (overestimation in the case of MOCAGE) and CO found in the models during this extreme pollution event.

Details

ISSN :
16807324 and 16807316
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....32ef8660ed00b7071c3af40ef995052b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-789-2010