Back to Search Start Over

Twenty years of experience in revision cochlear implant surgery: signs that indicate the need for revision surgery to audiologists

Authors :
Bajin
Merve Ozbal Batuk
Levent Sennaroglu
Betul Cicek Cinar
Mehmet Yarali
Gonca Sennaroglu
Source :
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 133:903-907
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo report device failures, audiological signs and other reasons for revision cochlear implant surgery, and discuss indications for revision surgery.MethodsRevision procedures between November 1997 and August 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Over 20 years, 2181 cochlear implant operations were performed, and 114 patients underwent 127 revision operations.ResultsThe revision rate was 4.67 per cent. The full insertion rate for revision cochlear implant surgery was 88.2 per cent. The most frequent reasons for revision surgery were: device failure (59 per cent), wound breakdown (9.4 per cent) and electrode malposition (8.7 per cent). The device failure rate was: 2.78 per cent for Advanced Bionics, 1.82 per cent for Cochlear and 5.25 per cent for Med-El systems. The number of active electrodes was significantly increased only for Med-El devices after revision surgery. The most common complaints among 61 patients were: gradually decreased auditory performance, sudden internal device shutdown and headaches.ConclusionThe most common reason for revision surgery was device failure. Patients should be evaluated for device failure in cases of: no hearing despite appropriate follow up, side effects such as facial nerve stimulation, and rejection of speech processor use in paediatrics. After revision surgery, most patients have successful outcomes.

Details

ISSN :
17485460 and 00222151
Volume :
133
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....32d8eee04ad6c55b9a48676ed3baea96
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215119001919