Back to Search Start Over

Social risk factors predicting outcomes of cervical myelopathy surgery

Authors :
Zachary D. Rethorn
Chad E. Cook
Christine Park
Tamara Somers
Praveen V. Mummaneni
Andrew K. Chan
Brenton H. Pennicooke
Erica F. Bisson
Anthony L. Asher
Avery L. Buchholz
Mohamad Bydon
Mohammed Ali Alvi
Domagoj Coric
Kevin T. Foley
Kai-Ming Fu
John J. Knightly
Scott Meyer
Paul Park
Eric A. Potts
Christopher I. Shaffrey
Mark Shaffrey
Khoi D. Than
Luis Tumialan
Jay D. Turner
Cheerag D. Upadhyaya
Michael Y. Wang
Oren Gottfried
Source :
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 37:41-48
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Combinations of certain social risk factors of race, sex, education, socioeconomic status (SES), insurance, education, employment, and one’s housing situation have been associated with poorer pain and disability outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. To date, an exploration of such factors in patients with cervical spine surgery has not been conducted. The objective of the current work was to 1) define the social risk phenotypes of individuals who have undergone cervical spine surgery for myelopathy and 2) analyze their predictive capacity toward disability, pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction–based outcomes. METHODS The Cervical Myelopathy Quality Outcomes Database was queried for the period from January 2016 to December 2018. Race/ethnicity, educational attainment, SES, insurance payer, and employment status were modeled into unique social phenotypes using latent class analyses. Proportions of social groups were analyzed for demonstrating a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 30% from baseline for disability, neck and arm pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction at the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups. RESULTS A total of 730 individuals who had undergone cervical myelopathy surgery were included in the final cohort. Latent class analysis identified 2 subgroups: 1) high risk (non-White race and ethnicity, lower educational attainment, not working, poor insurance, and predominantly lower SES), n = 268, 36.7% (class 1); and 2) low risk (White, employed with good insurance, and higher education and SES), n = 462, 63.3% (class 2). For both 3-month and 1-year outcomes, the high-risk group (class 1) had decreased odds (all p < 0.05) of attaining an MCID score in disability, neck/arm pain, and health-related quality of life. Being in the low-risk group (class 2) resulted in an increased odds of attaining an MCID score in disability, neck/arm pain, and health-related quality of life. Neither group had increased or decreased odds of being satisfied with surgery. CONCLUSIONS Although 2 groups underwent similar surgical approaches, the social phenotype involving non-White race/ethnicity, poor insurance, lower SES, and poor employment did not meet MCIDs for a variety of outcome measures. This finding should prompt surgeons to proactively incorporate socially conscience care pathways within healthcare systems, as well as to optimize community-based resources to improve outcomes and personalize care for populations at social risk.

Subjects

Subjects :
General Medicine

Details

ISSN :
15475654
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....32a61c0487c3cd75ef95497908245d99