Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of a machine-learning model for prediction of shoulder dystocia

Authors :
S. Toussia-Cohen
Dvir Aran
Marina Sirota
Yoav Brezinov
Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman
Eyal Sivan
Yair J. Blumenfeld
Abraham Tsur
Oren Barak
David K. Stevenson
Linoy Batsry
Maurice L. Druzin
Melissa G. Rosenstein
Source :
Ultrasound in obstetricsgynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyREFERENCES. 56(4)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To develop a machine-learning (ML) model for prediction of shoulder dystocia (ShD) and to externally validate the model's predictive accuracy and potential clinical efficacy in optimizing the use of Cesarean delivery in the context of suspected macrosomia. METHODS We used electronic health records (EHR) from the Sheba Medical Center in Israel to develop the model (derivation cohort) and EHR from the University of California San Francisco Medical Center to validate the model's accuracy and clinical efficacy (validation cohort). Subsequent to application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the derivation cohort included 686 singleton vaginal deliveries, of which 131 were complicated by ShD, and the validation cohort included 2584 deliveries, of which 31 were complicated by ShD. For each of these deliveries, we collected maternal and neonatal delivery outcomes coupled with maternal demographics, obstetric clinical data and sonographic fetal biometry. Biometric measurements and their derived estimated fetal weight were adjusted (aEFW) according to gestational age at delivery. A ML pipeline was utilized to develop the model. RESULTS In the derivation cohort, the ML model provided significantly better prediction than did the current clinical paradigm based on fetal weight and maternal diabetes: using nested cross-validation, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the model was 0.793 ± 0.041, outperforming aEFW combined with diabetes (AUC = 0.745 ± 0.044, P = 1e-16 ). The following risk modifiers had a positive beta that was > 0.02, i.e. they increased the risk of ShD: aEFW (beta = 0.164), pregestational diabetes (beta = 0.047), prior ShD (beta = 0.04), female fetal sex (beta = 0.04) and adjusted abdominal circumference (beta = 0.03). The following risk modifiers had a negative beta that was

Details

ISSN :
14690705
Volume :
56
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ultrasound in obstetricsgynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyREFERENCES
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....320fe4912de83528418d73b2baba16c0