Back to Search
Start Over
Development and validation of a machine-learning model for prediction of shoulder dystocia
- Source :
- Ultrasound in obstetricsgynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyREFERENCES. 56(4)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVES To develop a machine-learning (ML) model for prediction of shoulder dystocia (ShD) and to externally validate the model's predictive accuracy and potential clinical efficacy in optimizing the use of Cesarean delivery in the context of suspected macrosomia. METHODS We used electronic health records (EHR) from the Sheba Medical Center in Israel to develop the model (derivation cohort) and EHR from the University of California San Francisco Medical Center to validate the model's accuracy and clinical efficacy (validation cohort). Subsequent to application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the derivation cohort included 686 singleton vaginal deliveries, of which 131 were complicated by ShD, and the validation cohort included 2584 deliveries, of which 31 were complicated by ShD. For each of these deliveries, we collected maternal and neonatal delivery outcomes coupled with maternal demographics, obstetric clinical data and sonographic fetal biometry. Biometric measurements and their derived estimated fetal weight were adjusted (aEFW) according to gestational age at delivery. A ML pipeline was utilized to develop the model. RESULTS In the derivation cohort, the ML model provided significantly better prediction than did the current clinical paradigm based on fetal weight and maternal diabetes: using nested cross-validation, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the model was 0.793 ± 0.041, outperforming aEFW combined with diabetes (AUC = 0.745 ± 0.044, P = 1e-16 ). The following risk modifiers had a positive beta that was > 0.02, i.e. they increased the risk of ShD: aEFW (beta = 0.164), pregestational diabetes (beta = 0.047), prior ShD (beta = 0.04), female fetal sex (beta = 0.04) and adjusted abdominal circumference (beta = 0.03). The following risk modifiers had a negative beta that was
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Biometry
Context (language use)
Gestational Age
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Fetal Macrosomia
Machine Learning
Shoulder dystocia
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Risk Factors
Diabetes mellitus
Medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Clinical efficacy
Israel
Shoulder Dystocia
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
business.industry
Obstetrics
Cesarean Section
Patient Selection
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gestational age
Reproducibility of Results
General Medicine
Anthropometry
medicine.disease
Diabetes, Gestational
Reproductive Medicine
Fetal Weight
ROC Curve
Cohort
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14690705
- Volume :
- 56
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Ultrasound in obstetricsgynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyREFERENCES
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....320fe4912de83528418d73b2baba16c0