Back to Search
Start Over
Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
- Source :
- Dunford, R, Harrison, P, Smith, A, Dick, J, Barton, D N, Martin-Lopez, B, Kelemen, E, Jacobs, S, Saarikoski, H, Turkelboom, F, Verheyden, W, Hauck, J, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Badea, O, Baró, F, Berry, P, Carvalho, L, Conte, G, Czúcz, B, Garcia Blanco, G, Howard, D, Giuca, R, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Grizetti, B, Izakovicova, Z, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Luque, S, Lapola, D M, Martinez-Pastur, G, Mukhopadhyay, R, Roy, S B, Niemelä, J, Norton, L, Ochieng, J, Odee, D, Palomo, I, Pinho, P, Priess, J, Rusch, G, Saarela, S R, Santos, R, van der Wal, J T, Vadineanu, A, Vári, Á, Woods, H & Yli-Pelkonen, V 2018, ' Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment : Experiences from real world situations ', Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, no. Part C, pp. 499-514 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014, Dunford, R, Harrison, P, Smith, A, Dick, J, Barton, D N, Martin-Lopez, B, Kelemen, E, Jacobs, S, Saarikoski, H, Turkelboom, F, Verheyden, W, Hauck, J, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Badea, O, Baró, F, Berry, P, Carvalho, L, Conte, G, Czúcz, B, Garcia Blanco, G, Howard, D, Giuca, R, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Grizetti, B, Izakovicova, Z, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Luque, S, Lapola, D M, Martinez-Pastur, G, Mukhopadhyay, R, Roy, S B, Niemelä, J, Norton, L, Ochieng, J, Odee, D, Palomo, I, Pinho, P, Priess, J, Rusch, G, Saarela, S R, Santos, R, van der Wal, J T, Vadineanu, A, Vári, Á, Woods, H & Yli-Pelkonen, V 2018, ' Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment : Experiences from real world situations ' Ecosystem Services, vol 29, no. Part C, pp. 499-514 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014, Ecosystem Services, Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, 2018, 29 (part C), pp.499-514. ⟨10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014⟩, Ecosystem Services, 29(pt. C), 499-514, Ecosystem Services 29 (2018) pt. C, Scopus, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T16:50:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018-02-01 The Ecosystem Services (ES) concept highlights the varied contributions the environment provides to humans and there are a wide range of methods/tools available to assess ES. However, in real-world decision contexts a single tool is rarely sufficient and methods must be combined to meet practitioner needs. Here, results from the OpenNESS project are presented to illustrate the methods selected to meet the needs of 24 real-world case studies and better understand why and how methods are combined to meet practical needs. Results showed that within the cases methods were combined to: i) address a range of ES; ii) assess both supply and demand of ES; iii) assess a range of value types; iv) reach different stakeholder groups v) cover weaknesses in other methods used and vi) to meet specific decision context needs. Methods were linked in a variety of ways: i) as input–output chains of methods; ii) through learning; iii) through method development and iv) through comparison/triangulation of results. The paper synthesises these case study-based experiences to provide insight to others working in practical contexts as to where, and in what contexts, different methods can be combined and how this can add value to case study analyses. Environmental Change Institute, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Gaustadalléen 21 Leuphana University of Lüneburg Faculty of Sustainability Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Scharnhorststraβe 1 Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG Ltd.), Rómer Flóris u. 38. Department of Decision Sciences Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8. Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25 Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140 Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15 CoKnow Consulting – Coproducing Knowledge for Sustainability CENSE – Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Nova de Lisboa Institute of Ecology and Botany Centre for Ecological Research Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Alkotmány u. 2-4 National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Eroilor Blvd 128 Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA) Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) Edifici Z (ICTA-ICP), Carrer de les Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, Paris Cedex 05 Urban Environment and Territorial Sustainability Area Energy and Environment Dividision Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia C/Geldo, Edificio 700 University of Bucharest – Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability, Splaiul Independentei 91-95 Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric) Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003 European Commission – Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 Institute of Landscape Ecology Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3 IRSTEA National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture UMR TETIS, 500 rue JF Breton UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista Ecology Department – LabTerra, Av.24-A, 1515 CEP Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC CONICET), Houssay 200, Ushuaia (9140) IBRAD (Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development), VIP Road, Kestopur, Prafulla Kanan Department of Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 University of Helsinki Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), P.O.Box 20412-0200 Basque Centre for Climate Change, Alameda de Urquijo 4 INCLINE – Interdisciplinary Climate Change Research Group Instituto de Astronomia e Geofísica USP – Universidade de São Paulo, R. do Matão, 1226 – Butantã Wageningen University & Research – Marine (WUR), P.O.Box 57 IRIDRA, Via La Marmora Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) PRBB, Carrer Doctor Aiguader 88 UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista Ecology Department – LabTerra, Av.24-A, 1515 CEP
- Subjects :
- Process management
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Computer science
VALUATION
Geography, Planning and Development
ta1172
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
010501 environmental sciences
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
DECISION-MAKING
01 natural sciences
Sustainability Science
Decision context
Ecology and Environment
12. Responsible consumption
Supply and demand
Ecosystem services
Onderzoeksformatie
11. Sustainability
SUPPORT
Openness to experience
Life Science
Biology
1172 Environmental sciences
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Valuation (finance)
Global and Planetary Change
Ecology
OPENNESS
Stakeholder
15. Life on land
FRAMEWORK
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Method development
Ecosystems Research
13. Climate action
[SDE]Environmental Sciences
LANDSCAPES
EU
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 22120416
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Dunford, R, Harrison, P, Smith, A, Dick, J, Barton, D N, Martin-Lopez, B, Kelemen, E, Jacobs, S, Saarikoski, H, Turkelboom, F, Verheyden, W, Hauck, J, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Badea, O, Baró, F, Berry, P, Carvalho, L, Conte, G, Czúcz, B, Garcia Blanco, G, Howard, D, Giuca, R, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Grizetti, B, Izakovicova, Z, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Luque, S, Lapola, D M, Martinez-Pastur, G, Mukhopadhyay, R, Roy, S B, Niemelä, J, Norton, L, Ochieng, J, Odee, D, Palomo, I, Pinho, P, Priess, J, Rusch, G, Saarela, S R, Santos, R, van der Wal, J T, Vadineanu, A, Vári, Á, Woods, H & Yli-Pelkonen, V 2018, ' Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment : Experiences from real world situations ', Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, no. Part C, pp. 499-514 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014, Dunford, R, Harrison, P, Smith, A, Dick, J, Barton, D N, Martin-Lopez, B, Kelemen, E, Jacobs, S, Saarikoski, H, Turkelboom, F, Verheyden, W, Hauck, J, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Badea, O, Baró, F, Berry, P, Carvalho, L, Conte, G, Czúcz, B, Garcia Blanco, G, Howard, D, Giuca, R, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Grizetti, B, Izakovicova, Z, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Luque, S, Lapola, D M, Martinez-Pastur, G, Mukhopadhyay, R, Roy, S B, Niemelä, J, Norton, L, Ochieng, J, Odee, D, Palomo, I, Pinho, P, Priess, J, Rusch, G, Saarela, S R, Santos, R, van der Wal, J T, Vadineanu, A, Vári, Á, Woods, H & Yli-Pelkonen, V 2018, ' Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment : Experiences from real world situations ' Ecosystem Services, vol 29, no. Part C, pp. 499-514 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014, Ecosystem Services, Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, 2018, 29 (part C), pp.499-514. ⟨10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014⟩, Ecosystem Services, 29(pt. C), 499-514, Ecosystem Services 29 (2018) pt. C, Scopus, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....314f2870a2ac3871b8ca66a256b97ef5
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014