Back to Search Start Over

Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Models Cannot Discriminate Between Satisfied and Dissatisfied Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Authors :
Lyndsay E. Somerville
Bert M. Chesworth
Jacquelyn D. Marsh
Steven J. MacDonald
Brent A. Lanting
Dianne Bryant
Joseph S. Munn
Source :
The Journal of arthroplasty. 37(2)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND Approximately 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients are found to be dissatisfied or unsure of their satisfaction at 1-year post-surgery. This study attempted to predict 1-year post-surgery dissatisfied/unsure TKA patients with pre-surgery and surgical variables using logistic regression and machine learning methods. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2016 at a single institution was completed. Patients were split into satisfied and dissatisfied/unsure groups. Potential predictor variables included the following: demographic information, patella re-surfaced, posterior collateral ligament sacrificed, and subscales from the Knee Society Knee Scoring System, the Knee Society Clinical Rating System, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2. Logistic regression and 6 different machine learning methods were used to create prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination (AUC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve]) and calibration (Brier score, Cox intercept, and Cox slope) metrics. RESULTS There were 1432 eligible patients included in the analysis, 313 were considered to be dissatisfied/unsure. When evaluating discrimination, the logistic regression (AUC = 0.736) and extreme gradient boosted tree (AUC = 0.713) models performed best. When evaluating calibration, the logistic regression (Brier score = 0.141, Cox intercept = 0.241, and Cox slope = 1.31) and gradient boosted tree (Brier score = 0.149, Cox intercept = 0.054, and Cox slope = 1.158) models performed best. CONCLUSION The models developed in this study do not perform well enough as discriminatory tools to be used in a clinical setting. Further work needs to be done to improve the performance of pre-surgery TKA dissatisfaction prediction models.

Details

ISSN :
15328406
Volume :
37
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of arthroplasty
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3148663e1bb32bfbf5e3034f15e8f7ab