Back to Search
Start Over
Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept:Results from 27 case studies
- Source :
- Dick, J, Turkelboom, F, Woods, H, Iniesta-Arandia, I, Primmer, E, Saarela, S R, Bezák, P, Mederly, P, Leone, M, Verheyden, W, Kelemen, E, Hauck, J, Andrews, C, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Baró, F, Barton, D N, Berry, P, Bugter, R, Carvalho, L, Czúcz, B, Dunford, R, Garcia Blanco, G, Geamănă, N, Giucă, R, Grizzetti, B, Izakovičová, Z, Kertész, M, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Montenegro Lapola, D, Liquete, C, Luque, S, Martínez Pastur, G, Martin-Lopez, B, Mukhopadhyay, R, Niemela, J, Odee, D, Peri, P L, Pinho, P, Patrício-Roberto, G B, Preda, E, Priess, J, Röckmann, C, Santos, R, Silaghi, D, Smith, R, Vădineanu, A, van der Wal, J T, Arany, I, Badea, O, Bela, G, Boros, E, Bucur, M, Blumentrath, S, Calvache, M, Carmen, E, Clemente, P, Fernandes, J, Ferraz, D, Fongar, C, García-Llorente, M, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gundersen, V, Haavardsholm, O, Kalóczkai, Á, Khalalwe, T, Kiss, G, Köhler, B, Lazányi, O, Lellei-Kovács, E, Lichungu, R, Lindhjem, H, Magare, C, Mustajoki, J, Ndege, C, Nowell, M, Nuss Girona, S, Ochieng, J, Often, A, Palomo, I, Pataki, G, Reinvang, R, Rusch, G, Saarikoski, H, Smith, A, Soy Massoni, E, Stange, E, Vågnes Traaholt, N, Vári, Á, Verweij, P, Vikström, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V & Zulian, G 2018, ' Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept : Results from 27 case studies ' Ecosystem Services, vol 29, no. C, pp. 552-565 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015, Scopus, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP, Ecosystem Services, Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, 2018, 29 (part C), pp.552-565. ⟨10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015⟩, Ecosystem Services, 29(pt. C), 552-565, Addi: Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, Universidad del País Vasco, Ecosystem Services 29 (2018) pt. C, Dick, J, Turkelboom, F, Woods, H, Iniesta-Arandia, I, Primmer, E, Saarela, S R, Bezák, P, Mederly, P, Leone, M, Verheyden, W, Kelemen, E, Hauck, J, Andrews, C, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Baró, F, Barton, D N, Berry, P, Bugter, R, Carvalho, L, Czúcz, B, Dunford, R, Garcia Blanco, G, Geamănă, N, Giucă, R, Grizzetti, B, Izakovičová, Z, Kertész, M, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Montenegro Lapola, D, Liquete, C, Luque, S, Martínez Pastur, G, Martin-Lopez, B, Mukhopadhyay, R, Niemela, J, Odee, D, Peri, P L, Pinho, P, Patrício-Roberto, G B, Preda, E, Priess, J, Röckmann, C, Santos, R, Silaghi, D, Smith, R, Vădineanu, A, van der Wal, J T, Arany, I, Badea, O, Bela, G, Boros, E, Bucur, M, Blumentrath, S, Calvache, M, Carmen, E, Clemente, P, Fernandes, J, Ferraz, D, Fongar, C, García-Llorente, M, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gundersen, V, Haavardsholm, O, Kalóczkai, Á, Khalalwe, T, Kiss, G, Köhler, B, Lazányi, O, Lellei-Kovács, E, Lichungu, R, Lindhjem, H, Magare, C, Mustajoki, J, Ndege, C, Nowell, M, Nuss Girona, S, Ochieng, J, Often, A, Palomo, I, Pataki, G, Reinvang, R, Rusch, G, Saarikoski, H, Smith, A, Soy Massoni, E, Stange, E, Vågnes Traaholt, N, Vári, Á, Verweij, P, Vikström, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V & Zulian, G 2018, ' Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept : Results from 27 case studies ', Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, no. C, pp. 552-565 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015, Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, instname
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T17:15:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018-02-01 The ecosystem service (ES) concept is becoming mainstream in policy and planning, but operational influence on practice is seldom reported. Here, we report the practitioners’ perspectives on the practical implementation of the ES concept in 27 case studies. A standardised anonymous survey (n = 246), was used, focusing on the science-practice interaction process, perceived impact and expected use of the case study assessments. Operationalisation of the concept was shown to achieve a gradual change in practices: 13% of the case studies reported a change in action (e.g. management or policy change), and a further 40% anticipated that a change would result from the work. To a large extent the impact was attributed to a well conducted science-practice interaction process (>70%). The main reported advantages of the concept included: increased concept awareness and communication; enhanced participation and collaboration; production of comprehensive science-based knowledge; and production of spatially referenced knowledge for input to planning (91% indicated they had acquired new knowledge). The limitations were mostly case-specific and centred on methodology, data, and challenges with result implementation. The survey highlighted the crucial role of communication, participation and collaboration across different stakeholders, to implement the ES concept and enhance the democratisation of nature and landscape planning. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25 Social-ecological Systems Lab Department of Ecology Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Darwin no. 2, Campus de Cantoblanco Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140 Institute of Landscape Ecology Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademická 2 Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Constantine the Philosopher University, Trieda A. Hlinku 1 Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG Ltd.), Rómer Flóris u. 38. Department of Decision Sciences Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8. Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15 CoKnow Consulting – Coproducing Knowledge for Sustainability, Jesewitz CENSE – Centre for Environmental and Sustainability Research Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica Institute of Ecology and Botany MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Alkotmány u. 2-4. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA) Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) Edifici Z (ICTA-ICP), Carrer de les Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Gaustadalléen 21 Environmental Change Institute, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road Wageningen University and Research Environmental Research (Alterra), P.O. Box 47 European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, FR-75231 Paris Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford Urban Environment and Territorial Sustainability Area Energy and Environment Dividision Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia C/Geldo, Edificio 700 University of Bucharest - Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability, Splaiul Independentei 91-95 European Commission – Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749 Institute of Landscape Ecology Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3 UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista Ecology Department – LabTerra, Av. 24-A, 1515 CEP: 13506-900, Rio Claro IRSTEA National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture UMR TETIS, 500 rue JF BRETON Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC CONICET), Houssay 200 Leuphana University of Lüneburg Faculty of Sustainability Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Scharnhorststraβe 1 IBRAD (Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development), VIP Road, Kestopur, Prafulla Kanan Department of Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 University of Helsinki Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), P.O. Box 20412-0200 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), CC 332 (9400), Río Gallegos Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA) Río Gallegos Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) INCLINE – Interdisciplinary Climate Change Research Group Instituto de Astronomia e Geofísica USP – Universidade de São Paulo, R. do Matão, 1226 - Butantã Wageningen University & Research – Marine (WUR), P.O. Box 57 National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Eroilor Blvd 128 Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management Szent István University, Páter Károly u. 1. Norwegian University of Life Science (NMBU), Universitetstunet 3 Department of Applied Research and Agricultural Extension Madrid Institute for Rural Agricultural and Food Research and Development (IMIDRA), Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona (N-II), KM. 38.200, 28802 Alcalá De Henares Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric) Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Fakkelgården VISTA Analyse A/S, Meltzers gate 4 University of Girona, Plaça de Sant Domènec, 3 Basque Centre for Climate Change, Alameda de Urquijo 4 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Postboks 5685 Sluppen De Økonomiske Råd, Amaliegade 44 UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista Ecology Department – LabTerra, Av. 24-A, 1515 CEP: 13506-900, Rio Claro
- Subjects :
- knowledge
Knowledge management
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Geography, Planning and Development
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
010501 environmental sciences
01 natural sciences
Ecosystem services
Stakeholder perceptions
11. Sustainability
Aardobservatie en omgevingsinformatica
Biodiversiteit en Beleid
Mainstream
Sociology
Democratization
Evaluation
science
Valuation (finance)
Global and Planetary Change
STAKEHOLDERS
Ecology
PLACE-BASED IMPLEMENTATION
Corporate governance
Environmental resource management
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
ekosysteemipalvelut
governance
[SDE]Environmental Sciences
Landscape planning
valuation
STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTIONS
policy
Earth Observation and Environmental Informatics
ta1172
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Biodiversity and Policy
Sustainability Science
12. Responsible consumption
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OPERATIONALISATION
landscapes
Onderzoeksformatie
framework
Boundary-work
1172 Environmental sciences
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Ecosystem services operationalisation
business.industry
Impact assessment
Place-based implementation
boundary-work
15. Life on land
trade-offs
13. Climate action
business
Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210 [VDP]
management practice
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 22120416
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Dick, J, Turkelboom, F, Woods, H, Iniesta-Arandia, I, Primmer, E, Saarela, S R, Bezák, P, Mederly, P, Leone, M, Verheyden, W, Kelemen, E, Hauck, J, Andrews, C, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Baró, F, Barton, D N, Berry, P, Bugter, R, Carvalho, L, Czúcz, B, Dunford, R, Garcia Blanco, G, Geamănă, N, Giucă, R, Grizzetti, B, Izakovičová, Z, Kertész, M, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Montenegro Lapola, D, Liquete, C, Luque, S, Martínez Pastur, G, Martin-Lopez, B, Mukhopadhyay, R, Niemela, J, Odee, D, Peri, P L, Pinho, P, Patrício-Roberto, G B, Preda, E, Priess, J, Röckmann, C, Santos, R, Silaghi, D, Smith, R, Vădineanu, A, van der Wal, J T, Arany, I, Badea, O, Bela, G, Boros, E, Bucur, M, Blumentrath, S, Calvache, M, Carmen, E, Clemente, P, Fernandes, J, Ferraz, D, Fongar, C, García-Llorente, M, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gundersen, V, Haavardsholm, O, Kalóczkai, Á, Khalalwe, T, Kiss, G, Köhler, B, Lazányi, O, Lellei-Kovács, E, Lichungu, R, Lindhjem, H, Magare, C, Mustajoki, J, Ndege, C, Nowell, M, Nuss Girona, S, Ochieng, J, Often, A, Palomo, I, Pataki, G, Reinvang, R, Rusch, G, Saarikoski, H, Smith, A, Soy Massoni, E, Stange, E, Vågnes Traaholt, N, Vári, Á, Verweij, P, Vikström, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V & Zulian, G 2018, ' Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept : Results from 27 case studies ' Ecosystem Services, vol 29, no. C, pp. 552-565 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015, Scopus, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP, Ecosystem Services, Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, 2018, 29 (part C), pp.552-565. ⟨10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015⟩, Ecosystem Services, 29(pt. C), 552-565, Addi: Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, Universidad del País Vasco, Ecosystem Services 29 (2018) pt. C, Dick, J, Turkelboom, F, Woods, H, Iniesta-Arandia, I, Primmer, E, Saarela, S R, Bezák, P, Mederly, P, Leone, M, Verheyden, W, Kelemen, E, Hauck, J, Andrews, C, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Baró, F, Barton, D N, Berry, P, Bugter, R, Carvalho, L, Czúcz, B, Dunford, R, Garcia Blanco, G, Geamănă, N, Giucă, R, Grizzetti, B, Izakovičová, Z, Kertész, M, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Montenegro Lapola, D, Liquete, C, Luque, S, Martínez Pastur, G, Martin-Lopez, B, Mukhopadhyay, R, Niemela, J, Odee, D, Peri, P L, Pinho, P, Patrício-Roberto, G B, Preda, E, Priess, J, Röckmann, C, Santos, R, Silaghi, D, Smith, R, Vădineanu, A, van der Wal, J T, Arany, I, Badea, O, Bela, G, Boros, E, Bucur, M, Blumentrath, S, Calvache, M, Carmen, E, Clemente, P, Fernandes, J, Ferraz, D, Fongar, C, García-Llorente, M, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gundersen, V, Haavardsholm, O, Kalóczkai, Á, Khalalwe, T, Kiss, G, Köhler, B, Lazányi, O, Lellei-Kovács, E, Lichungu, R, Lindhjem, H, Magare, C, Mustajoki, J, Ndege, C, Nowell, M, Nuss Girona, S, Ochieng, J, Often, A, Palomo, I, Pataki, G, Reinvang, R, Rusch, G, Saarikoski, H, Smith, A, Soy Massoni, E, Stange, E, Vågnes Traaholt, N, Vári, Á, Verweij, P, Vikström, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V & Zulian, G 2018, ' Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept : Results from 27 case studies ', Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, no. C, pp. 552-565 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015, Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, instname
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3141757a4ad00410694fc0ea552ad3b8
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015