Back to Search Start Over

Quality of advanced ovarian cancer surgery: A French assessment of ESGO quality indicators

Authors :
Cécile Loaec
Frank Priou
Xavier Aireau
Marie-Mélanie Gac
Romuald Wernert
C. Bourgin
Fabienne Empereur
Edouard Vaucel
Jean-Marc Classe
Hugues Bourgeois
Valérie Delecroix
Paule Augereau
Loïc Campion
Pascaline Deblaye
Philippe Descamps
Johanna Silve
Alain Lortholary
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest [Angers/Nantes] (UNICANCER/ICO)
UNICANCER
Réseau régional de Cancérologie Onco Pays de la Loire [Nantes] (Plateau des écoles)
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)
Centre Hospitalier de Cholet (CHC)
Centre Catherine-de-Sienne [Nantes] (CCS)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (CHU Angers)
PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM)
CHD Vendée - Hôpital Les Oudairies [La Roche sur Yon]
Clinique Victor Hugo [Le Mans]
Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire (Saint Nazaire)
Integrative Oncogenomics of Multiple Myeloma Pathogenesis and Progression (CRCINA-ÉQUIPE 11)
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Nantes-Angers (CRCINA)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Nantes - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (UFR MEDECINE)
Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN)-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université d'Angers (UA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Nantes - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (UFR MEDECINE)
Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN)-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université d'Angers (UA)
CRLCC René Gauducheau
Université de Nantes (UN)
Centre Hospitalier Départemental - Hôpital de La Roche-sur-Yon (CHD Vendée)
Université d'Angers (UA)-Université de Nantes (UN)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)-Université d'Angers (UA)-Université de Nantes (UN)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)
Bernardo, Elizabeth
Source :
EJSO-European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO-European Journal of Surgical Oncology, WB Saunders, 2020, 47 (2), pp.360-366. ⟨10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.003⟩, EJSO-European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 47 (2), pp.360-366. ⟨10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.003⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; Objectives: In 2016, the European Society of Gynecology Oncology (ESGO) published indicators defining the quality of surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer. The objective of the study was to assess the quality of ovarian cancer patient management in regional centers authorized for gynecological cancer, based on the ESGO list of quality indicators. Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 1 to June 30, 2016. The following quality indicators 1 "rate of complete surgical resection", 4 "center participating in clinical trials in gynecologic oncology", 5 "treatment planned and reviewed at a multidisciplinary team meeting", 6 "required preoperative workup", 8 "minimum required elements in operative reports" and 9 "minimum required elements in pathology reports" were selected. Results: 91 patients were evaluated in 16 centers. The required preoperative workup was incomplete in 25% of cases. Treatment was not planned at a multidisciplinary team meeting for 24%. An evaluation score of peritoneal involvement was included in 40% of the operative reports and the quality of surgical resection was reported in 72%. Primary surgery was most often performed in a peripheral hospital (48%), interval surgery in a private center (37%), and closure surgery in a regional cancer center (43%). No institution respected the six quality indicators evaluated. One regional cancer center respected five items and two private centers did not respect any. Conclusion: Whilst the ESGO quality indicators provide objective, validated and evaluable support which centers can use to improve quality of care, we observed heterogeneous practices amongst the centers evaluated.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07487983
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EJSO-European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO-European Journal of Surgical Oncology, WB Saunders, 2020, 47 (2), pp.360-366. ⟨10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.003⟩, EJSO-European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 47 (2), pp.360-366. ⟨10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.003⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....31251b425160e37c129bd7cf3e1d9bfe
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.003⟩