Back to Search Start Over

O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protein expression by immunohistochemistry in brain and non-brain systemic tumours: systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction

Authors :
Javier Ibáñez
Avelina Tortosa
Marta Brell
Universitat de Barcelona
Source :
BMC Cancer, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 35 (2011), BMC Cancer, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2011.

Abstract

Background: The DNA repair protein O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) confers resistance to alkylating agents. Several methods have been applied to its analysis, with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) the most commonly used for promoter methylation study, while immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become the most frequently used for the detection of MGMT protein expression. Agreement on the best and most reliable technique for evaluating MGMT status remains unsettled. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the correlation between IHC and MSP. Methods: A computer-aided search of MEDLINE (1950-October 2009), EBSCO (1966-October 2009) and EMBASE (1974-October 2009) was performed for relevant publications. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were those comparing MGMT protein expression by IHC with MGMT promoter methylation by MSP in the same cohort of patients. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS and STARD instruments. Previously published guidelines were followed for meta-analysis performance. Results: Of 254 studies identified as eligible for full-text review, 52 (20.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The review showed that results of MGMT protein expression by IHC are not in close agreement with those obtained with MSP. Moreover, type of tumour (primary brain tumour vs others) was an independent covariate of accuracy estimates in the meta-regression analysis beyond the cut-off value. Conclusions: Protein expression assessed by IHC alone fails to reflect the promoter methylation status of MGMT. Thus, in attempts at clinical diagnosis the two methods seem to select different groups of patients and should not be used interchangeably.<br />This study was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo (Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria 08/1085; Instituto de Salud Carlos III-RETIC RD06/0020/0097) and the Fundacion Medica Mutua Madrilena, 2007.

Details

ISSN :
14712407
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....30fb9e3ee9baf848004fcc9ddc98147c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-35