Back to Search Start Over

Injectable macromolecule-based calcium phosphate bone substitutes

Authors :
Hilel Moussi
Pierre Weiss
Jean Le Bideau
Hélène Gautier
Baptiste Charbonnier
BASCHERA, Richard
Institut des Matériaux Jean Rouxel (IMN)
Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Nantes université - UFR des Sciences et des Techniques (Nantes univ - UFR ST)
Nantes Université - pôle Sciences et technologie
Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université - pôle Sciences et technologie
Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université - Ecole Polytechnique de l'Université de Nantes (Nantes Univ - EPUN)
Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)
Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS)
École nationale vétérinaire, agroalimentaire et de l'alimentation Nantes-Atlantique (ONIRIS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Nantes Université - UFR Odontologie
Nantes Université - pôle Santé
Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université - pôle Santé
Source :
Materials Advances, Materials Advances, 2022, 3 (15), pp.6125-6141. ⟨10.1039/d2ma00410k⟩
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2022.

Abstract

International audience; Injectable bone substitutes (IBS) represent compelling options for bone regenerative medicine as they can be used to optimally fill a complex bone defect through minimally invasive intervention. Since their discovery, calcium phosphate (CaP) based IBS have never stopped evolving to match the diverse clinical needs. The main challenge is to combine the desired physico-chemical and handling properties of the IBS to an optimal induced biological response. This cannot unfortunately be achieved with CaP biomaterials alone, hence a growing use of polymers and organic macromolecules as additives. To properly understand the ins and outs, a didactic classification of IBS is proposed in this review, which compiles the past, present and future developments of IBS. Class I IBS, taking advantage of ceramic particles or granules as the support for bone formation, are already commercialized and widely employed in clinics. In contrast, Class II IBS, where cements serve as a stiff matrix for the development of mineralized tissues, associated with polymers, are still in their early stages but have shown significant improvements versus Class I products. These innovative Class II IBS will be the second focal point of this review.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26335409
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Materials Advances, Materials Advances, 2022, 3 (15), pp.6125-6141. ⟨10.1039/d2ma00410k⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....30504b0ec13d09432772a070189f8643
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ma00410k⟩