Back to Search Start Over

Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid

Authors :
Anna Bateson
Julio Ortiz Canseco
Timothy D. McHugh
Adam A. Witney
Silke Feuerriegel
Matthias Merker
Thomas A. Kohl
Christian Utpatel
Stefan Niemann
Sönke Andres
Katharina Kranzer
Florian P Maurer
Arash Ghodousi
Emanuele Borroni
Daniela Maria Cirillo
Maria Wijkander
Juan C. Toro
Ramona Groenheit
Jim Werngren
Diana Machado
Miguel Viveiros
Robin M. Warren
Frederick Sirgel
Anzaan Dippenaar
Claudio U. Köser
Eugene Sun
Juliano Timm
Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT)
Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM)
TB, HIV and opportunistic diseases and pathogens (THOP)
Source :
The journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives To develop a robust phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method with a correctly set breakpoint for pretomanid (Pa), the most recently approved anti-tuberculosis drug. Methods The Becton Dickinson Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system was used at six laboratories to determine the MICs of a phylogenetically diverse collection of 356 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to establish the epidemiological cut-off value for pretomanid. MICs were correlated with WGS data to study the genetic basis of differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid. Results We observed ancient differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid among various members of MTBC. Most notably, lineage 1 of M. tuberculosis, which is estimated to account for 28% of tuberculosis cases globally, was less susceptible than lineages 2, 3, 4 and 7 of M. tuberculosis, resulting in a 99th percentile of 2 mg/L for lineage 1 compared with 0.5 mg/L for the remaining M. tuberculosis lineages. Moreover, we observed that higher MICs (≥8 mg/L), which probably confer resistance, had recently evolved independently in six different M. tuberculosis strains. Unlike the aforementioned ancient differences in susceptibility, these recent differences were likely caused by mutations in the known pretomanid resistance genes. Conclusions In light of these findings, the provisional critical concentration of 1 mg/L for MGIT set by EMA must be re-evaluated. More broadly, these findings underline the importance of considering the global diversity of MTBC during clinical development of drugs and when defining breakpoints for AST.

Details

ISSN :
14602091 and 03057453
Volume :
77
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....303f16b61277835fae9a44efaeb750fd