Back to Search Start Over

Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) with Anatomically Guided (3D) Neural Targeting Shows Superior Chronic Axial Low Back Pain Relief Compared to Traditional SCS-LUMINA Study

Authors :
Matthew McCarty
Louis J. Raso
Alden Sherman
Nameer Haider
Lilly Chen
Thomas L. Yearwood
T. Brent Chafin
Anthony P. Berg
Kevin D. Cairns
Elias Veizi
Robert Frey
John Brendel
Henry Vucetic
Salim M. Hayek
James North
Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov
Source :
Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 18(8)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to determine whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using 3D neural targeting provided sustained overall and low back pain relief in a broad routine clinical practice population. Study Design and Methods This was a multicenter, open-label observational study with an observational arm and retrospective analysis of a matched cohort. After IPG implantation, programming was done using a patient-specific, model-based algorithm to adjust for lead position (3D neural targeting) or previous generation software (traditional). Demographics, medical histories, SCS parameters, pain locations, pain intensities, disabilities, and safety data were collected for all patients. Results A total of 213 patients using 3D neural targeting were included, with a trial-to-implant ratio of 86%. Patients used seven different lead configurations, with 62% receiving 24 to 32 contacts, and a broad range of stimulation parameters utilizing a mean of 14.3 (±6.1) contacts. At 24 months postimplant, pain intensity decreased significantly from baseline (ΔNRS = 4.2, N = 169, P

Details

ISSN :
15264637
Volume :
18
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3028a617e9fb7c30b451cd47bbaf7c6f