Back to Search Start Over

Ultrasound performs better than radiographs

Authors :
Angelika Reissig
Gebhard Mathis
Armin Seibel
Michael Blaivas
Andrew S. Liteplo
Daniel Lichtenstein
Roberto Copetti
Eustachio Agricola
Enrico Storti
Luca Neri
Lawrence Melniker
Richard Hoppmann
Gino Soldati
Gabriele Via
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
James W. Tsung
Charlotte Arbelot
Belaid Bouhemad
Tomislav Petrovic
Mahmoud Elbarbary
Anthony J. Dean
Luna Gargani
Scott A. Dulchavsky
Giovanni Volpicelli
Vicki E. Noble
Jean-Jacques Rouby
Agricola, E
Arbelot, C
Blaivas, M
Bouhemad, B
Copetti, R
Dean, A
Dulchavsky, S
Elbarbary, M
Gargani, L
Hoppmann, R
Kirkpatrick, Aw
Lichtenstein, D
Liteplo, A
Mathis, G
Melniker, L
Neri, L
Noble, Ve
Petrovic, T
Reissig, A
Rouby, Jj
Seibel, A
Soldati, G
Storti, E
Tsung, Jw
Via, G
Volpicelli, G.
Source :
Thorax. 66(9)
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

We applaud the British Thoracic Society (BTS) for its efforts to improve patient care through scientific evidence. We thus recognise the recent guidelines on pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound (TUS) as an important attempt to develop a rational approach to chest sonography.1 However, we are concerned that the BTS has reached conclusions based on a less complete review of TUS. The guidelines state that ‘the utility of thoracic ultrasound for diagnosing a pneumothorax is limited in hospital practice due to the ready availability of chest x-rays (CXR) and conflicting data from published reports’.1 This conclusion appears to be based on a small (but landmark) study of 11 patients from 1986 to 1989, two small studies with only four pneumothoraces in …

Details

ISSN :
14683296
Volume :
66
Issue :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Thorax
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2f82666161552aec2efc0d8bce7f1769