Back to Search Start Over

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a personalised intervention for carers of people requiring home oxygen therapy

Authors :
Suzanne Van Asten
Khin Hnin
Ruth Sladek
Mary A. Luszcz
Richard J. Woodman
Simon Eckermann
Tanja W. Effing
Debra Rowett
Paul Cafarella
Paddy A. Phillips
Tina Jones
Sandra L Bradley
Peter Frith
Frith, Peter
Sladek, Ruth
Woodman, Richard
Effing, Tanja
Bradley, Sandra
van Asten, Suzanne
Jones, Tina
Hnin, Khin
Luszcz, Mary
Cafarella, Paul
Eckermann, Simon
Rowett, Debra
Phillips, Paddy A
Internal medicine
Source :
Frith, P, Sladek, R, Woodman, R, Effing, T, Bradley, S, van Asten, S, Jones, T, Hnin, K, Luszcz, M, Cafarella, P, Eckermann, S, Rowett, D & Phillips, P A 2020, ' Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a personalised intervention for carers of people requiring home oxygen therapy ', Chronic Respiratory Disease, vol. 17 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1479973119897277, Chronic Respiratory Disease, Chronic Respiratory Disease, 17. SAGE Publications Ltd
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

We used a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate a behavioural change strategy targeting carers of chronically hypoxaemic patients using long-term home oxygen therapy. Intervention group carers participated in personalised educational sessions focusing on motivating carers to take actions to assist patients. All patients received usual care. Effectiveness was measured through a composite event of patient survival to hospitalisation, residential care admission or death to 12 months. Secondary outcomes at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months included carer and patient emotional and physical well-being. No difference between intervention ( n = 100) and control ( n = 97) patients was found for the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.89, 1.68; p = 0.22). Improved fatigue, mastery, vitality and general health occurred in intervention group patients (all p values < 0.05). No benefits were seen in carer outcomes. Mortality was significantly higher in intervention patients (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.00, 4.14; p = 0.05; adjusted for Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status), with a significant diagnosis–intervention interaction ( p = 0.028) showing higher mortality in patients with COPD (HR 4.26; 95% CI = 1.60, 11.35) but not those with interstitial lung disease (HR 0.83; 95% CI = 0.28, 2.46). No difference was detected in the primary outcome, but patient mortality was higher when carers had received the intervention, especially in the most disabled patients. Trials examining behavioural change interventions in severe disease should stratify for functionality, and both risks and benefits should be independently monitored. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12607000177459).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14799723
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Frith, P, Sladek, R, Woodman, R, Effing, T, Bradley, S, van Asten, S, Jones, T, Hnin, K, Luszcz, M, Cafarella, P, Eckermann, S, Rowett, D & Phillips, P A 2020, ' Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a personalised intervention for carers of people requiring home oxygen therapy ', Chronic Respiratory Disease, vol. 17 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1479973119897277, Chronic Respiratory Disease, Chronic Respiratory Disease, 17. SAGE Publications Ltd
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2f1863a6da4a34929cdc3c5a52f0195e