Back to Search Start Over

Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Initial Experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Authors :
Pamela Piacente
Khurshid A. Guru
Hyung L. Kim
James L. Mohler
Source :
Urology. 69:469-474
Publication Year :
2007
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2007.

Abstract

Objectives One series of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection has been reported. We report our operative technique and initial experience. Methods Twenty consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and open urinary diversion for operable bladder cancer from October 2005 to June 2006. Data were collected prospectively on patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, pathologic staging, and postoperative outcomes. Results The mean patient age was 70 years (range 56 to 90). The mean body mass index was 26 kg/m 2 (range 17.3 to 36). Fourteen patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 197 minutes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy, 44 minutes for pelvic lymph node dissection, and 133 minutes for urinary diversion. The mean blood loss was 555 mL. One case was converted to an open procedure because of the patient’s inability to tolerate the Trendelenburg position. The mean hospital stay was 10 days. Two patients had major complications. One patient had positive vaginal margins and 9 of 26 nodes were positive. Four patients had incidental prostate cancer. The mean time to the return to nonstrenuous activity was 4 weeks and to strenuous activity was 10 weeks. Conclusions Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed safely in patients who are considered candidates for open cystectomy. Long-term oncologic control data and functional outcomes are needed to assess the true benefits of robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

Details

ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
69
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2f15958a14cf93543355fb95cddd1866
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.037