Back to Search Start Over

Right ventricle assessment in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Authors :
Rocio Hinojar
Luisa Salido
Ana María García
J M Monteagudo
Ez-Alddin Rajjoub
Ciro Santoro
Rosana Hernández-Antolín
Ariana González
Ana Pardo Sanz
José Luis Zamorano
Covadonga Fernández-Golfín
Ángel Sánchez Recalde
Pardo Sanz, A.
Santoro, C.
Hinojar, R.
Salido, L.
Rajjoub, E. -A.
Monteagudo, J. M.
Garcia, A.
Gonzalez, A.
Hernandez-Antolin, R.
Sanchez Recalde, A.
Zamorano, J. L.
Fernandez-Golfin, C.
Source :
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)REFERENCES. 37(4)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Introduction: Limited data are available regarding the evaluation of right ventricular (RV) performance in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of RV dysfunction in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI and long-term changes. Methods: Consecutive patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI from January 2016 to July 2017 were included. RV anatomical and functional parameters were analyzed: RV diameters, fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), S-wave tissue Doppler of the tricuspid annulus (RV-S'TDI), global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS), and free wall strain (RV-FWS). Preprocedure and 1-year echo were analyzed. Results: Final population included 114 patients, mean age 83.63 ± 6.31 years, and 38.2% women. The prevalence of abnormal RV function was high, variable depending on the parameter that we analyzed, and it showed a significant reduction 1 year after TAVI implantation: 13.9% vs 6.8% (TAPSE [20]), P =.049; and 48.7% vs 28.9% (RV-FWS > [20]), P =.03. Significant differences were noted between patients with low-flow (LF) vs normal-flow (NF) AS in RV dysfunction prevalence as well as in RV function recovery which is less evident in LF compared with NF patients. Conclusions: RV dysfunction is high among symptomatic AS patients undergoing TAVI, with variable prevalence depending on the echocardiographic parameter used.

Details

ISSN :
15408175
Volume :
37
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)REFERENCES
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2ee4d48112f8aa51f9af68f619b12c97