Back to Search Start Over

ACR appropriateness criteria on metastatic bone disease

Authors :
Leanne L. Seeger
William B. Morrison
Michael A. Bruno
Stephen Lutz
Jon A. Jacobson
Ian Blair Fries
William K. Payne
Richard H. Daffner
Laura W. Bancroft
Langston T. Holly
Mihra S. Taljanovic
James N. Wise
Jonathan S. Luchs
Charles S. Resnik
Barbara N. Weissman
Isabelle M. Germano
Catherine C. Roberts
Judy S. Blebea
D. Lee Bennett
Jeffrey J. Olson
Mark E. Schweitzer
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, vol 7, iss 6, Roberts, CC; Daffner, RH; Weissman, BNW; Bancroft, LW; Bennett, DL; Blebea, JS; et al.(2010). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Metastatic Bone Disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7(6), 400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5fw3z4wb, Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol 7, iss 6, Roberts, CC; Daffner, RH; Weissman, BNW; Bancroft, LW; Bennett, DL; Blebea, JS; et al.(2010). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Metastatic Bone Disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7(6), 400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/81j3m4mm
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2010.

Abstract

Appropriate imaging modalities for screening, staging, and surveillance of patients with suspected and documented metastatic disease to bone include 99mTc bone scanning, MRI, CT, radiography, and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-PET. Clinical scenarios reviewed include asymptomatic stage 1 breast carcinoma, symptomatic stage 2 breast carcinoma, abnormal bone scan results with breast carcinoma, pathologic fracture with known metastatic breast carcinoma, asymptomatic well-differentiated and poorly differentiated prostate carcinoma, vertebral fracture with history of malignancy, non-small-cell lung carcinoma staging, symptomatic multiple myeloma, osteosarcoma staging and surveillance, and suspected bone metastasis in a pregnant patient. No single imaging modality is consistently best for the assessment of metastatic bone disease across all tumor types and clinical situations. In some cases, no imaging is indicated. The recommendations contained herein are the result of evidence-based consensus by the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Radiology. © 2010 American College of Radiology.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, vol 7, iss 6, Roberts, CC; Daffner, RH; Weissman, BNW; Bancroft, LW; Bennett, DL; Blebea, JS; et al.(2010). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Metastatic Bone Disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7(6), 400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5fw3z4wb, Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol 7, iss 6, Roberts, CC; Daffner, RH; Weissman, BNW; Bancroft, LW; Bennett, DL; Blebea, JS; et al.(2010). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Metastatic Bone Disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7(6), 400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/81j3m4mm
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2eb426fbc397a99e05052f70fce0ee6e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015.