Back to Search Start Over

Triple Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis Phe508del –Gating and –Residual Function Genotypes

Authors :
VX18-445-104 Study Group
Barry, Peter J
Mall, Marcus A
Álvarez, Antonio
Colombo, Carla
de Winter-de Groot, Karin M
Fajac, Isabelle
McBennett, Kimberly A
McKone, Edward F
Ramsey, Bonnie W
Sutharsan, Sivagurunathan
Taylor-Cousar, Jennifer L
Tullis, Elizabeth
Ahluwalia, Neil
Jun, Lucy S
Moskowitz, Samuel M
Prieto-Centurion, Valentin
Tian, Simon
Waltz, David
Xuan, Fengjuan
Zhang, Yaohua
Rowe, Steven M
Polineni, Deepika
Vanderhelst, Eef
De Wachter, Elke
Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp)
Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)
Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy
Clinical sciences
Pneumology
Pediatrics
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2021, 385 (9), pp.815-825. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa2100665⟩, N Engl J Med
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor is a small-molecule cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator regimen shown to be efficacious in patients with at least one Phe508del allele, which indicates that this combination can modulate a single Phe508del allele. In patients whose other CFTR allele contains a gating or residual function mutation that is already effectively treated with previous CFTR modulators (ivacaftor or tezacaftor–ivacaftor), the potential for additional benefit from restoring Phe508del CFTR protein function is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial involving patients 12 years of age or older with cystic fibrosis and Phe508del–gating or Phe508del–residual function genotypes. After a 4-week run-in period with ivacaftor or tezacaftor–ivacaftor, patients were randomly assigned to receive elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor or active control for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the absolute change in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) from baseline through week 8 in the elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor group. RESULTS: After the run-in period, 132 patients received elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor and 126 received active control. Elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor resulted in a percentage of predicted FEV(1) that was higher by 3.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 4.6) relative to baseline and higher by 3.5 percentage points (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.7) relative to active control and a sweat chloride concentration that was lower by 22.3 mmol per liter (95% CI, 20.2 to 24.5) relative to baseline and lower by 23.1 mmol per liter (95% CI, 20.1 to 26.1) relative to active control (P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793 and 15334406
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2021, 385 (9), pp.815-825. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa2100665⟩, N Engl J Med
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2d49a389d697896fcc9784fdccd67e9e