Back to Search
Start Over
Facilitating population genomics of non-model organisms through optimized experimental design for reduced representation sequencing
- Source :
- BMC Genomics, BMC genomics, 22 (1, BMC Genomics, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-20 (2021), BMC Genomics, BioMed Central, 2021, 22 (1), pp.625. ⟨10.1186/s12864-021-07917-3⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background: Genome-wide data are invaluable to characterize differentiation and adaptation of natural populations. Reduced representation sequencing (RRS) subsamples a genome repeatedly across many individuals. However, RRS requires careful optimization and fine-tuning to deliver high marker density while being cost-efficient. The number of genomic fragments created through restriction enzyme digestion and the sequencing library setup must match to achieve sufficient sequencing coverage per locus. Here, we present a workflow based on published information and computational and experimental procedures to investigate and streamline the applicability of RRS. Results: In an iterative process genome size estimates, restriction enzymes and size selection windows were tested and scaled in six classes of Antarctic animals (Ostracoda, Malacostraca, Bivalvia, Asteroidea, Actinopterygii, Aves). Achieving high marker density would be expensive in amphipods, the malacostracan target taxon, due to the large genome size. We propose alternative approaches such as mitogenome or target capture sequencing for this group. Pilot libraries were sequenced for all other target taxa. Ostracods, bivalves, sea stars, and fish showed overall good coverage and marker numbers for downstream population genomic analyses. In contrast, the bird test library produced low coverage and few polymorphic loci, likely due to degraded DNA. Conclusions: Prior testing and optimization are important to identify which groups are amenable for RRS and where alternative methods may currently offer better cost-benefit ratios. The steps outlined here are easy to follow for other non-model taxa with little genomic resources, thus stimulating efficient resource use for the many pressing research questions in molecular ecology.<br />SCOPUS: ar.j<br />info:eu-repo/semantics/published
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
MESH: Sequence Analysis, DNA
ECOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Genome Scan
QH426-470
01 natural sciences
Genome
Population genomics
MARKERS
MESH: Animals
SOUTHERN-OCEAN
biodiversity
Genetics & Heredity
0303 health sciences
education.field_of_study
CLIMATE-CHANGE
MESH: Genomics
MESH: Research Design
In silico digestion
Biodiversity
Genomics
CAPTURE
Research Design
Genotyping by sequencing
MESH: Metagenomics
DNA microarray
Biologie
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Biotechnology
CONSERVATION
Population
Biotechnologie
SNP
Locus (genetics)
Computational biology
Biology
010603 evolutionary biology
Molecular ecology
03 medical and health sciences
Genetics
Animals
Humans
MESH: Genome
DNA CONTENT
Southern Ocean
education
Genome size
Selection (genetic algorithm)
030304 developmental biology
MESH: Humans
[SDV.GEN.GPO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]
Science & Technology
Research
RAD
Sequence Analysis, DNA
RADseq
Restriction enzyme
SIZE
Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
Metagenomics
Genome scan
TP248.13-248.65
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14712164
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Genomics, BMC genomics, 22 (1, BMC Genomics, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-20 (2021), BMC Genomics, BioMed Central, 2021, 22 (1), pp.625. ⟨10.1186/s12864-021-07917-3⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2c9a2cab279ad6f7e5ce67b3ba88694e
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.30.437642