Back to Search Start Over

Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

Authors :
Louis Denis
Jonas Hugosson
Arnauld Villers
Teuvo L.J. Tammela
Marco Zappa
Chris H. Bangma
Harry J. de Koning
Alvaro Paez
Maciej Kwiatkowski
Carlotta Buzzoni
Sigrid Carlsson
Vera Nelen
Marcos Lujan
Xavier Rebillard
Marco Randazzo
Fritz H. Schröder
Monique J. Roobol
Anssi Auvinen
Sue Moss
Donella Puliti
University of Tampere [Finland]
Erasmus University Medical Center [Rotterdam] (Erasmus MC)
Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg [Göteborg]
Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Center [New York]
Queen Mary University of London (QMUL)
University hospital of Zurich [Zurich]
Clinique Beau Soleil [Montpellier]
Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron [Pôle Chimie Balard] (IBMM)
Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Tampere University Hospital
Université de Lille
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille)
Urology
Public Health
Source :
European Urology, European Urology, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, European Urology, Elsevier, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, European Urology, 68(5), 885-890. Elsevier
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2016.

Abstract

Background: The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown a 21% reduction in prostate cancer (PCa) mortality and a 1.6-fold increase in PCa incidence with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening (at 13 yr of follow-up). We evaluated PCa incidence by risk category at diagnosis across the study arms to assess the potential impact on PCa mortality. Design, setting, and participants: Information on arm, centre, T and M stage, Gleason score, serum PSA at diagnosis, age at randomisation, follow-up time, and vital status were extracted from the ERSPC database. Four risk categories at diagnosis were defined: 1, low; 2, intermediate; 3, high; 4, metastatic disease. PSA ( 100 ng/ml) was used as the indicator of metastasis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for screening versus control arm by risk category at diagnosis and follow-up time were calculated using Poisson regression analysis for seven centres. Follow-up was truncated at 13 yr. Missing data were imputed using chained equations. The analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. Results and limitations: In the screening arm, 7408 PCa cases were diagnosed and 6107 in the control arm. The proportion of missing stage, Gleason score, or PSA value was comparable in the two arms (8% vs 10%), but differed among centres. The IRRs were elevated in the screening arm for the low-risk (IRR: 2.14; 95% CI, 2.03-2.25) and intermediate-risk (IRR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.34) categories at diagnosis, equal to unity for the high-risk category at diagnosis (IRR: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.13), and reduced for metastatic disease at diagnosis (IRR: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.70). The IRR of metastatic disease had temporal pattern similar to mortality, shifted forwards an average of almost 3 yr, although the mortality reduction was smaller. Conclusions: The results confirm a reduction in metastatic disease at diagnosis in the screening arm, preceding mortality reduction by almost 3 yr. Patient summary: The findings of this study indicate that the decrease in metastatic disease at diagnosis is the major determinant of the prostate cancer mortality reduction in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. (C) 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03022838 and 1421993X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Urology, European Urology, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, European Urology, Elsevier, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, European Urology, 68(5), 885-890. Elsevier
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2b2dd0ee8a77e2f89e85399e10a1af70
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩