Back to Search
Start Over
Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
- Source :
- European Urology, European Urology, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, European Urology, Elsevier, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, European Urology, 68(5), 885-890. Elsevier
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2016.
-
Abstract
- Background: The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown a 21% reduction in prostate cancer (PCa) mortality and a 1.6-fold increase in PCa incidence with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening (at 13 yr of follow-up). We evaluated PCa incidence by risk category at diagnosis across the study arms to assess the potential impact on PCa mortality. Design, setting, and participants: Information on arm, centre, T and M stage, Gleason score, serum PSA at diagnosis, age at randomisation, follow-up time, and vital status were extracted from the ERSPC database. Four risk categories at diagnosis were defined: 1, low; 2, intermediate; 3, high; 4, metastatic disease. PSA ( 100 ng/ml) was used as the indicator of metastasis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for screening versus control arm by risk category at diagnosis and follow-up time were calculated using Poisson regression analysis for seven centres. Follow-up was truncated at 13 yr. Missing data were imputed using chained equations. The analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. Results and limitations: In the screening arm, 7408 PCa cases were diagnosed and 6107 in the control arm. The proportion of missing stage, Gleason score, or PSA value was comparable in the two arms (8% vs 10%), but differed among centres. The IRRs were elevated in the screening arm for the low-risk (IRR: 2.14; 95% CI, 2.03-2.25) and intermediate-risk (IRR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.34) categories at diagnosis, equal to unity for the high-risk category at diagnosis (IRR: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.13), and reduced for metastatic disease at diagnosis (IRR: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.70). The IRR of metastatic disease had temporal pattern similar to mortality, shifted forwards an average of almost 3 yr, although the mortality reduction was smaller. Conclusions: The results confirm a reduction in metastatic disease at diagnosis in the screening arm, preceding mortality reduction by almost 3 yr. Patient summary: The findings of this study indicate that the decrease in metastatic disease at diagnosis is the major determinant of the prostate cancer mortality reduction in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. (C) 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Subjects :
- Male
Oncology
030232 urology & nephrology
urologic and male genital diseases
[SDV.MHEP.UN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Urology and Nephrology
law.invention
Metastasis
Prostate cancer
PSA
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Neoplasm Metastasis
Stage (cooking)
Early Detection of Cancer
Incidence
Incidence (epidemiology)
Middle Aged
Mortality reduction
3. Good health
Prostate-specific antigen
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
symbols
Regression Analysis
Kallikreins
Risk assessment
medicine.medical_specialty
Prostate screening
Urology
[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer
Risk Assessment
Article
03 medical and health sciences
symbols.namesake
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Poisson regression
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Gynecology
business.industry
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate-Specific Antigen
medicine.disease
Metastatic cancer incidence
[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Neoplasm Grading
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03022838 and 1421993X
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Urology, European Urology, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, European Urology, Elsevier, 2016, 68 (5), pp.885-890. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩, Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, European Urology, 68(5), 885-890. Elsevier
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2b2dd0ee8a77e2f89e85399e10a1af70
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042⟩