Back to Search
Start Over
Publishing in potentially predatory journals: Do universities adopt university leaders' dishonest behavior?
- Source :
- Accountability in research.
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- With the development of science digitalization, it became possible to detect dishonest behavior. The increasing magnitude of predatory publishing has boosted scientific research on the topic. While studies on university leaders' impact concentrate mainly on its positive effects on organizational performance, to date, little is known about whether academic leaders can negatively influence the organizations they lead depending on their engagement in academic misconduct. Using a sample of Russian universities and their leaders from 2010-2020, I ask whether universities tend to adopt leaders' dishonest behavior. Specifically, I analyzed whether universities increase publications in potentially predatory journals after a leader with such a record enters the office. Relying on a culture theory of academic misconduct, I discuss the role-related factors that contribute to a leader's influence over employees. I focus on whether the leader's influence relates to external incentives for universities to publish more, the leader's career development type, or the leader's and university's research area. The findings demonstrate that the share of publications in potentially predatory journals tends to increase if a leader with such publications assumes office, especially if the university is research-oriented. The results suggest that academic reputation of a leader matters to the university's consequent misconduct.
- Subjects :
- General Medicine
Library and Information Sciences
Education
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15455815
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Accountability in research
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2a5a860f87889b53960ac35d960068ea