Back to Search Start Over

European River Typologies Fail to Capture Diatom, Fish, and Macrophyte Community Composition

Authors :
Jupke, Jonathan F.
Birk, Sebastian
Apostolou, Apostolos
Aroviita, Jukka
Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette
Baláži, Peter
Barešová, Libuše
Blanco, Saúl
Borrego, María
van Dam, Herman
Dimitriou, Elias
Feld, Christian K.
Ferreira, Maria Teresa
Gecheva, Gana
Gomà, Joan
Hanžek, Nikola
Haslev, Ida Marie
Isheva, Tsvetelina
Jamoneau, Aurelien
Jyrkänkallio- Mikkola, Jenny
Kahlert, Maria
Karaouzas, Ioannis
Karjalainen, Satu Maaria
Olenici, Adriana
Panek, Piotr
Paril, Petr
Peeters, Edwin T.H.M.
Polášek, Marek
Pont, Didier
Pumputyte, Audrone
Sandin, Leonard
Sochuliaková, Lucia
Soininen, Janne
Stanković, Igor
Straka, Michal
Šušnjara, Mirela
Sutela, Tapio
Tison-Rosebery, Juliette
Udovič, Marija Gligora
Verhofstad, Michiel
Žutinić, Petar
Schäfer, Ralf B.
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2023.

Abstract

Typology systems are frequently used in applied and fundamental ecology and are relevant for environmental monitoring and conservation. They aggregate ecosystems into discrete types based on biotic and abiotic variables, assuming that ecosystems of the same type are more alike than ecosystems of different types with regard to a specific property of interest. We evaluated whether this assumption is met by the Broad River Types (BRT), a recently proposed European river typology system, that classifies river segments based on abiotic variables, when it is used to group biological communities. We compiled data on the community composition of diatoms, fishes, and aquatic macrophytes throughout Europe and evaluated whether the composition is more similar in site groups with the same river type than in site groups of different river types using Analysis of Similarities, classification strength, typical species analysis, and the area under zeta diversity decline curves. We compared the performance of the BRT with those of four region- based typology systems, namely, Illies Freshwater Ecoregions, the Biogeographic Regions, the Freshwater Ecoregions of the World, and the Environmental Zones, as well as spatial autocorrelation (SA) classifications. All typology systems received low scores from most evaluation methods, relative to predefined thresholds and the SA classifications. The BRT often scored lowest of all typology systems. Within each typology system, community composition overlapped considerably between site groups defined by the types of the systems. The overlap tended to be the lowest for fishes and between Illies Freshwater Ecoregions. In conclusion, we found that existing broad-scale river typology systems fail to delineate site groups with distinct and compositionally homogeneous communities of diatoms, fishes, and macrophytes. A way to improve the fit between typology systems and biological communities might be to combine segment-based and region-based typology systems to simultaneously account for local environmental variation and historical distribution patterns, thus potentially improving the utility of broad-scale typology systems for freshwater biota.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2a29a0a4e42aa88634ef1ca2422e2334