Back to Search Start Over

Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction

Authors :
Peter Eriksson
David Erlinge
Ollie Östlund
Henrik Wagner
Bo Lindvall
Pontus Lindroos
Iwar Sjögren
Stefan James
Rikard Linder
Jens Jensen
Mikael Danielewicz
Jonas Andersson
Bo Lagerqvist
Oskar Angerås
Sasha Koul
Matthias Götberg
Loghman Henareh
Jan Haupt
Ole Fröbert
Leszek Zagozdzon
Peter Hårdhammar
Tim Tödt
Truls Råmunddal
Claes Held
Anders Ulvenstam
Mikael Aasa
Jason Stewart
Dan Ioanes
Thomas Kellerth
Fredrik Scherstén
Pallonji Bhiladvala
Eva Swahn
Lars Wallentin
Helena Wikström
Mehmet Hamid
Anders Lundin
Elmir Omerovic
Per Grimfjärd
Lotta Robertsson
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för kardiovaskulär medicin, 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The comparative efficacy of various anticoagulation strategies has not been clearly established in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to current practice, which includes the use of radial-artery access for PCI and administration of potent P2Y 12 inhibitors without the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized, registry-based, open-label clinical trial, we enrolled patients with either ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) who were undergoing PCI and receiving treatment with a potent P2Y(12) inhibitor (ticagrelor, prasugrel, or cangrelor) without the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The patients were randomly assigned to receive bivalirudin or heparin during PCI, which was performed predominantly with the use of radial-artery access. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding during 180 days of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 6006 patients (3005 with STEMI and 3001 with NSTEMI) were enrolled in the trial. At 180 days, a primary end-point event had occurred in 12.3% of the patients (369 of 3004) in the bivalirudin group and in 12.8% (383 of 3002) in the heparin group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.10; P = 0.54). The results were consistent between patients with STEMI and those with NSTEMI and across other major subgroups. Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.0% of the patients in the bivalirudin group and in 2.4% in the heparin group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.19; P = 0.33), major bleeding in 8.6% and 8.6%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.19; P = 0.98), definite stent thrombosis in 0.4% and 0.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.10; P = 0.09), and death in 2.9% and 2.8%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.41; P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing PCI for myocardial infarction, the rate of the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding was not lower among those who received bivalirudin than among those who received heparin monotherapy. (Funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and others; Funding Agencies|Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation; Swedish Research Council; AstraZeneca; Medicines Company; Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (as part of the TOTAL-AMI project)

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....29ba5a896ff46854a131bd0215fb112e