Back to Search
Start Over
Bivalirudin versus Heparin Monotherapy in Myocardial Infarction
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för kardiovaskulär medicin, 2017.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND The comparative efficacy of various anticoagulation strategies has not been clearly established in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to current practice, which includes the use of radial-artery access for PCI and administration of potent P2Y 12 inhibitors without the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized, registry-based, open-label clinical trial, we enrolled patients with either ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) who were undergoing PCI and receiving treatment with a potent P2Y(12) inhibitor (ticagrelor, prasugrel, or cangrelor) without the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The patients were randomly assigned to receive bivalirudin or heparin during PCI, which was performed predominantly with the use of radial-artery access. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding during 180 days of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 6006 patients (3005 with STEMI and 3001 with NSTEMI) were enrolled in the trial. At 180 days, a primary end-point event had occurred in 12.3% of the patients (369 of 3004) in the bivalirudin group and in 12.8% (383 of 3002) in the heparin group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.10; P = 0.54). The results were consistent between patients with STEMI and those with NSTEMI and across other major subgroups. Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.0% of the patients in the bivalirudin group and in 2.4% in the heparin group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.19; P = 0.33), major bleeding in 8.6% and 8.6%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.19; P = 0.98), definite stent thrombosis in 0.4% and 0.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.10; P = 0.09), and death in 2.9% and 2.8%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.41; P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing PCI for myocardial infarction, the rate of the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding was not lower among those who received bivalirudin than among those who received heparin monotherapy. (Funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and others; Funding Agencies|Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation; Swedish Research Council; AstraZeneca; Medicines Company; Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (as part of the TOTAL-AMI project)
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Percutaneous
medicine.medical_treatment
Myocardial Infarction
Hemorrhage
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Randomized controlled trial
law
Internal medicine
Medicine
Bivalirudin
Humans
In patient
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
030212 general & internal medicine
Myocardial infarction
cardiovascular diseases
Aged
Kardiologi
business.industry
Heparin
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Anticoagulants
General Medicine
Hirudins
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Combined Modality Therapy
Peptide Fragments
Recombinant Proteins
Editorial
Multicenter study
Cardiology
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
Female
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....29ba5a896ff46854a131bd0215fb112e