Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation, comparison of different solvent extraction, cell disruption methods and hydrothermal liquefaction of Oedogonium macroalgae for biofuel production

Authors :
Manisha Nanda
Nishesh Sharma
Bharti Ramola
Yashi Mishra
Tushar Tyagi
Ayushi Gupta
Vinod Kumar
Source :
Biotechnology Reports, Biotechnology Reports, Vol 22, Iss, Pp-(2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

Graphical abstract<br />Highlights • Lipids yield increased by osmotic shock cell disruption method. • High percentage of hexadecanoic acid (52–68%) was obtained by soxhlet extraction. • Impurities of chlorophyll and protein were also detected in the extracted lipids. • Only one type of FAME, hexadecanoic acid methyl ester was obtained by Triton X-100. • 23.3 wt% of crude oil was produced by HTL of algal biomass with TiO2 at 300 °C.<br />Cell disruption and lipid extraction methods for macroalgae are not well reported. Therefore, we compared various lipid extraction methods and extraction efficiency of various solvents to improve lipid yields from Oedogonium fresh water macroalgae. Lipid extraction was done by 2 methods viz., modified Bligh and Dyer method and soxhlet extraction using either single solvents or mixtures. In soxhlet extraction method five solvents were used (1) Hexane commonly used solvent for lipid extractions, (2) chloroform: methanol (2:1), (3) Chloroform: hexane (1:1), (4) Chloroform: hexane (1:2), (5) Dichloromethane + methanol (2:1). To improve lipid extraction yields, various cell disruption methods were also compared during the present study. Impurities of chlorophyll and protein were also detected in the extracted lipids. Hydrothermal liquefaction of algal biomass with TiO2 was also conducted at 300 °C. HTL was more effective by which 23.3 wt% of bio-crude oil was obtained.

Details

ISSN :
2215017X
Volume :
22
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Biotechnology Reports
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2989efdfb28f02b9fc8d1c82ca953e18