Back to Search Start Over

A case for improved assessment of gut permeability – a meta-analysis quantifying the lactulose:mannitol ratio in coeliac and Crohn’s disease

Authors :
Scarlet Nazarian
Hutan Ashrafian
Ara Darzi
Julian Teare
Jonathan Gan
Alexander J. Thompson
National Institute of Health Research
Source :
BMC Gastroenterology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2022), BMC Gastroenterology
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Research Square Platform LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Background A widely used method in assessing small bowel permeability is the lactulose:mannitol test, where the lactulose:mannitol ratio (LMR) is measured. However, there is discrepancy in how the test is conducted and in the values of LMR obtained across studies. This meta-analysis aims to determine LMR in healthy subjects, coeliac and Crohn’s disease. Methods A literature search was performed using PRISMA guidance to identify studies assessing LMR in coeliac or Crohn’s disease. 19 studies included in the meta-analysis measured gut permeability in coeliac disease, 17 studies in Crohn’s disease. Outcomes of interest were LMR values and comparisons of standard mean difference (SMD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) in healthy controls, inactive Crohn’s, active Crohn’s, treated coeliac and untreated coeliac. Pooled estimates of differences in LMR were calculated using the random effects model. Results Pooled LMR in healthy controls was 0.014 (95% CI: 0.006–0.022) while pooled LMRs in untreated and treated coeliac were 0.133 (95% CI: 0.089–0.178) and 0.037 (95% CI: 0.019–0.055). In active and inactive Crohn’s disease, pooled LMRs were 0.093 (95% CI: 0.031–0.156) and 0.028 (95% CI: 0.015–0.041). Significant differences were observed in LMR between: (1) healthy controls and treated coeliacs (SMD = 0.409 95% CI 0.034 to 0.783, p = 0.032), (2) healthy controls and untreated coeliacs (SMD = 1.362 95% CI: 0.740 to 1.984, p p = 0.001), (4) healthy controls and inactive Crohn’s (SMD = 1.265 95% CI: 0.845 to 1.686, p p p = 0.001). High heterogeneity was observed, which was attributed to variability in protocols used across different studies. Conclusion The use of gut permeability measurements in screening and monitoring of coeliac and Crohn’s disease is promising. LMR is useful in performing this function with significant limitations. More robust alternative tests with higher degrees of clinical evidence are needed if measurements of gut permeability are to find widespread clinical use.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Gastroenterology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2022), BMC Gastroenterology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....296d98eb3eff87e694a210c4ee4e72e4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-257838/v1