Back to Search Start Over

Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach

Authors :
Camilla Ceroni
Mickael Poidevin
Bruno Lemaitre
Mark Austin Hanson
Anna Dostalova
Shu Kondo
Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
eLife, eLife, eLife Sciences Publication, 2019, 8, ⟨10.7554/eLife.44341⟩, eLife, 2019, 8, ⟨10.7554/eLife.44341⟩, eLife, Vol 8 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are host-encoded antibiotics that combat invading microorganisms. These short, cationic peptides have been implicated in many biological processes, primarily involving innate immunity. In vitro studies have shown AMPs kill bacteria and fungi at physiological concentrations, but little validation has been done in vivo. We utilized CRISPR gene editing to delete all known immune-inducible AMPs of Drosophila, namely: 4 Attacins, 4 Cecropins, 2 Diptericins, Drosocin, Drosomycin, Metchnikowin and Defensin. Using individual and multiple knockouts, including flies lacking all 14 AMP genes, we characterize the in vivo function of individual and groups of AMPs against diverse bacterial and fungal pathogens. We found that Drosophila AMPs act primarily against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, contributing either additively or synergistically. We also describe remarkable specificity wherein certain AMPs contribute the bulk of microbicidal activity against specific pathogens, providing functional demonstrations of highly specific AMP-pathogen interactions in an in vivo setting.<br />eLife digest All animals – from humans to mice, jellyfish to fruit flies – are armed with an immune system to defend against infections. The immune system’s first line of defence often involves a group of short proteins called antimicrobial peptides. These proteins are found anywhere that germs and microbes come into contact with the body, including the skin, eyes and lungs. In many cases, it is unclear how individual antimicrobial peptides work. For example, which germs are they most effective against? Do they work alone, or in a mixture of other antimicrobial peptides? To learn more about a protein, scientists can often delete the gene that encodes it and observe what happens. Antimicrobial peptides, however, are small proteins encoded by a large number of very short genes, which makes them difficult to target with most genetic tools. Fortunately, gene editing via the CRISPR/Cas9 system can overcome many of the limitations of more traditional methods; this allowed Hanson et al. to systematically remove the antimicrobial peptide genes from fruit flies to explore how these proteins work. In the experiments, all 14 antimicrobial peptide genes known from fruit flies were removed, and the flies were then infected with a variety of bacteria and fungi. Hanson et al. found that the antimicrobial peptides were effective against many bacteria, but unexpectedly they were far more important for controlling one general kind of bacterial infection, but not another kind. Further experiments showed that some of these proteins work alone, targeting only a particular species of microbe. This finding suggested that animals might fight infections by very specific bacteria with a very specific antimicrobial peptide rather than with a mixture. By understanding how antimicrobial peptides work in more detail, scientists can learn what types of microbes they are most effective against. In the future, this information may eventually lead to the development of new types of antibiotics and better management of diseases that affect important insects, like bumblebees.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2050084X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
eLife, eLife, eLife Sciences Publication, 2019, 8, ⟨10.7554/eLife.44341⟩, eLife, 2019, 8, ⟨10.7554/eLife.44341⟩, eLife, Vol 8 (2019)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....296bdd4ad982cbe2219cfa335368e0eb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44341⟩