Back to Search Start Over

Development of a Complication- and Treatment-Aware Prediction Model for Favorable Functional Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Based on Machine Learning

Authors :
Oliver Bozinov
Serge Marbacher
Luca Regli
Johannes Goldberg
Josef Schmid
Roy Thomas Daniel
Anna M Zeitlberger
David Bervini
Marketa Sosnova
Jonathan Rychen
Martin N. Stienen
Donato D'Alonzo
Karl Lothard Schaller
Alessio Chiappini
Thomas Robert
Adrien May
Nicolai Maldaner
Javier Fandino
Philippe Bijlenga
Christian Fung
Daniel W Zumofen
Martin Seule
Victor E. Staartjes
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
Rodolfo Maduri
Bawarjan Schatlo
Michel Roethlisberger
Astrid Weyerbrock
Carlo Serra
University of Zurich
Source :
Neurosurgery, Vol. 88, No 2 (2021) pp. E150-E157
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND Current prognostic tools in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are constrained by being primarily based on patient and disease characteristics on admission. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a complication- and treatment-aware outcome prediction tool in aSAH. METHODS This cohort study included data from an ongoing prospective nationwide multicenter registry on all aSAH patients in Switzerland (Swiss SOS [Swiss Study on aSAH]; 2009-2015). We trained supervised machine learning algorithms to predict a binary outcome at discharge (modified Rankin scale [mRS] ≤ 3: favorable; mRS 4-6: unfavorable). Clinical and radiological variables on admission ("Early" Model) as well as additional variables regarding secondary complications and disease management ("Late" Model) were used. Performance of both models was assessed by classification performance metrics on an out-of-sample test dataset. RESULTS Favorable functional outcome at discharge was observed in 1156 (62.0%) of 1866 patients. Both models scored a high accuracy of 75% to 76% on the test set. The "Late" outcome model outperformed the "Early" model with an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.85 vs 0.79, corresponding to a specificity of 0.81 vs 0.70 and a sensitivity of 0.71 vs 0.79, respectively. CONCLUSION Both machine learning models show good discrimination and calibration confirmed on application to an internal test dataset of patients with a wide range of disease severity treated in different institutions within a nationwide registry. Our study indicates that the inclusion of variables reflecting the clinical course of the patient may lead to outcome predictions with superior predictive power compared to a model based on admission data only.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0148396X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neurosurgery, Vol. 88, No 2 (2021) pp. E150-E157
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2881729e8f8b43924b10be1bc91e16f0