Back to Search Start Over

Participant Preferences for Pharmacologic Chronic Pain Treatment Trial Characteristics: An ACTTION Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Study

Authors :
Jennifer S. Gewandter
Leslie Tive
Penney Cowan
Janet A. Vaughan
Robert H. Dworkin
Rachel A. Kitt
Alesia Sadosky
John D. Markman
Dennis C. Turk
Richard Malamut
Shannon M. Smith
Ernest A. Kopecky
Source :
The journal of pain. 17(11)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Barriers to clinical trial recruitment can delay study completion, potentially resulting in increased costs and an unrepresentative sample. In the current study of 150 participants with chronic pain, we used a computerized adaptive choice-based conjoint survey that included 8 characteristics that may affect enrollment in pharmacologic pain treatment trials (ie, treatment allocation, frequency of pain ratings, treatment administration method, current medications, number of study visits, availability of evening and weekend visits, invasiveness of laboratory procedures, payment). These data were analyzed using Sawtooth Software ver. 8.4.8 (Sawtooth Software, Inc, Orem, UT), which identifies the characteristics that dominate participants' decisions across multiple sets of potential trials. Three characteristics had the largest relative importance in participants’ trial preferences: 1) invasiveness of required laboratory procedures (ie, 22%), with no procedures or blood tests preferred over ice-water sensory testing or skin biopsy; 2) ability to continue current pain medications (21%); and 3) payment for study participation (21%), with higher payment preferred. The fourth most important characteristic was number of study visits (13%), with participants preferring fewer in-person visits and more phone contacts. Understanding the preferences of potential participants is an important step toward enhancing enrollment in pain treatment trials. Perspective This article presents the preferences of individuals with chronic pain conditions regarding modifiable pain treatment trial characteristics (eg, number of study visits, payment, treatment allocation). These findings may help to improve enrollment into analgesic clinical trials and in turn accelerate the development of new pain treatments.

Details

ISSN :
15288447
Volume :
17
Issue :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The journal of pain
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....262f2f4237fcb5f3d83e0cbc3f2871c9