Back to Search Start Over

A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Prospective Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety of a Polyethylene Glycol Hydrogel (Duraseal Dural Sealant System) as a Dural Sealant in Cranial Surgery

Authors :
Mark E. Shaffrey
Joshua W. Osbun
J. Paul Muizelaar
Jeremy D.W. Greenlee
Mitesh V. Shah
Patrick J. Connolly
Martin E. Weinand
John G. Golfinos
James E. Wilberger
Richard G. Ellenbogen
John M. Tew
Stephen J. Haines
Johnny B. Delashaw
Randall M. Chesnut
Anil Nanda
Harry R. van Loveren
Jonathan White
G. Rees Cosgrove
Lawrence S. Chin
Jack Jallo
Toxicogenomics
RS: GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction
Source :
World Neurosurgery, 78(5), 498-504. Elsevier Science
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Incisional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after cranial surgery is a significant cause of morbidity due to poor wound healing and infection, meningitis, and pseudomeningocele formation. Many common dural closure techniques, such as sutures, autologous grafts, gelatin or collagen sponges, and fibrin glues, are used to achieve watertight closure, although none are US Food and Drug Administration approved for this use. DuraSeal Dural Sealant System is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for obtaining watertight dural closure when applied after standard dural suturing. This multicenter, prospective randomized study further evaluated the safety of a PEG hydrogel compared with common dural sealing techniques.A total of 237 patients undergoing elective cranial surgery at 17 institutions were randomized to dural closure augmented with the PEG hydrogel or a control "standard of care" dural sealing technique after Valsalva maneuver demonstrated an intraoperative nonwatertight dural closure. Data were collected on complications resulting in unplanned postoperative interventions or reoperations, surgical site infections, CSF leaks, and other neurological complications within 30 days. Surgeons also provided data on the ease of use of the dural sealing techniques, as well as preparation and application times.The incidences of neurosurgical complications, surgical site infections, and CSF leaks were similar between treatment and control groups, with no statistically significant difference between the measures. In the PEG hydrogel group (n = 120), the incidence of neurosurgical complications was 5.8% (n = 7), the incidence of surgical site infections was 1.7% (n = 2), and the incidence of CSF leak was 0.8% (n = 1). In the control group (n = 117), the incidence of neurosurgical complications was 7.7% (n = 9), the incidence of surgical site infection was 2.6% (n = 3), and the incidence of CSF leak was 1.7% (n = 2). Sealant preparation time was less than 5 minutes in 96.6% of the PEG hydrogel group compared with 66.4% of controls (P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18788750
Volume :
78
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World Neurosurgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....25e75cf641073c02fe822aa4afa8dafc