Back to Search Start Over

Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study

Authors :
Kamarajah, Sivesh K
Mohamed, Imran
Nepogodiev, Dmitri
Evans, Richard PT
Hodson, James
Griffiths, Ewen A
Singh, Pritam
Committee, Steering
Alderson, Derek
Bundred, James
Evans, Richard
Gossage, James
Jefferies, Benjamin
Mckay, Siobhan
Siaw-Acheampong, Kobby
van Hillegersberg, Richard
Vohra, Ravinder
Wanigsooriya, Kasun
Whitehouse, Tony
Bekele, A
Achiam, Mp
Ahmed, H
Ainsworth, A
Akhtar, K
Akkapulu, N
Al-Khyatt, W
Alasmar, M
Alemu, Bn
Alfieri, R
Alkhaffaf, B
Alvarez, Ls
Amahu, V
Andreollo, Na
Arias, F
Ariyarathenam, A
Arndt, A
Athanasiou, A
Azagra, Js
Baban, C
Babor, R
Baili, E
Balla, A
Beenen, E
Bendixen, M
Bennett, J
Bergeat, D
Bernardes, Aj
Bernardi, D
Berrisford, R
Bianchi, A
Bjelovic, M
Blencowe, N
Boddy, A
Bogdan, S
Bolger, J
Bonavina, L
Bouras, G
Bouwense, S
Bowrey, D
Bragg, D
Bright, Tn
Broderick, S
Buduhan, G
Byrne, B
Carey, D
Carroll, P
Carrott, P
Casaca, R
Castro, Rg
Catton, J
Cerdeira, Mp
Chang, Ac
Charalabopoulos, A
Chaudry, A
Choh, C
Ciprian, B
Ciubotaru, C
Coe, P
Colak, E
Colino, Rb
Colucci, N
Costa, Pm
Daniela, K
Das, N
Davies, A
Davies, N
de Manzoni, G
del Val, Id
Dexter, S
Dolan, J
Donlon, N
Donohoe, C
Duffy, J
Dwerryhouse, S
Egberts, Jh
Ekwunife, C
Elhadi, A
Elhadi, M
Elliott, Ja
Elnagar, H
Elnagar, F
Faraj, Ha
Farooq, N
Fearon, N
Fekaj, E
Forshaw, M
Freire, J
Gacevski, G
Gaedcke, J
Giacopuzzi, S
Gijón, Mm
Gisbertz, S
Golcher, H
Gordon, A
Gossage, J
Griffiths, E
Grimminger, P
Guner, A
Gutknecht, S
Harustiak, T
Hedberg, J
Heisterkamp, J
Hii, M
Hindmarsh, A
Holm, J
Hornby, S
Isik, A
Izbicki, J
Jagadesham, V
Jaunoo, S
Johansson, J
Johnson, Ma
Johnston, B
Kapoulas, S
Kauppi, J
Kauppila, Jh
Kechagias, A
Kelly, M
Kelty, C
Kennedy, A
Khan, M
Khattak, S
Kidane, B
Kjaer, Dw
Klarenbeek, B
Korkolis, Dp
Koshy, Rm
Krantz, S
Lagarde, S
Larsen, Mh
Lau, Pc
Leeder, Pc
Leite, Js
Liakakos, T
Madhavan, A
Mahdi, Si
Mahendran, Ha
Mahmoodzadeh, H
Majbar, A
Manatakis, D
Markar, S
Martijnse, I
Matei, B
Matos da Costa, P
Mccormack, K
Mcnally, S
Meriläinen, S
Merrett, N
Migliore, M
Mingol, F
Mitton, D
Mogoanta, Ss
Mönig, Sp
Moorthy, K
Muhinga, M
Mwachiro, M
Naeem, A
Nasir, I
Navidi, M
Negoi, I
Negoiţă, V
Niazi, Sk
Nilsson, M
Pazdro, A
Pera, M
Perez, Cj
Perivoliotis, K
Peters, C
Phillips, Aw
Powell, A
Prove, L
Pucher, Ph
Rahman, S
Räsänen, Jv
Read, M
Reeh, M
Reim, D
Reynolds, J
Robb, Wb
Robertson, K
Rodica, B
Rosero, G
Rosman, C
Saadeh, L
Santos, Eg
Saunders, J
Sayyed, R
Schizas, D
Scurtu, Rr
Sekhniaidze, D
Serralheiro, Pa
Sevinç, B
Sgromo, B
Shakeel, O
Siemsen, M
Skipworth, R
Smith, B
Soares, A
Spillane, J
Steliga, Ma
Sundbom, M
Sydiuk, A
Takahashi, Aml
Talbot, M
Tan, B
Tareen, Ma
Tewari, N
Tez, M
Theodorou, D
Tita, A
Toledo, E
Townend, Pj
Triantafyllou, T
Trugeda, M
Tucker, O
Turner, P
Turrado, V
Underwood, T
Vaccari, S
Valmasoni, M
van Berge Henegouwen, M
van Boxel, G
van den Berg, Jw
van der Sluis, P
van Hillegersberg, R
van Lanschot, Jjb
van Workum, F
Vickers, J
Videira, J
Viswanath, Y
Vohra, R
Voon, K
Wadley, M
Walker, R
Wallner, B
Walsh, Tn
Weindelmayer, J
Welch, N
Wheatley, T
Wijnhoven, B
Wong, Lf
Yanni, F
Yeung, J
Zacharakis, Null
Moenig, Stefan Paul
Source :
British Journal of Surgery, 108, 1, pp. 66-73, British Journal of Surgery, 108, 66-73, British journal of surgery, Vol. 108, No 1 (2021) pp. 66-73
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020.

Abstract

Background The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income. Results In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis. Conclusion Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.

Details

ISSN :
13652168 and 00071323
Volume :
108
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....237499d4e6fe1908f76ced6bb537afc9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaa034