Back to Search Start Over

Diverse Mechanisms of Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae at a Health Care System in Silicon Valley, California

Authors :
Johanna Sandlund
Nancy Watz
Dietmar Küeltz
Isabella A. Tickler
Fred C. Tenover
Carlos A. Gomez
Fiona Senchyna
Tessa M. Andermann
Indre Budvytiene
Niaz Banaei
Rajiv L. Gaur
Gongyi Shi
Ami S. Bhatt
Guillaume Tremintin
Cynthia Truong
Fiona B. Tamburini
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2018.

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are emerging as a major health threat in North America. The mechanism of resistance to carbapenems has therapeutic and public health implications. We comprehensively characterized the underlying mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in CRE isolates recovered between 2013 and 2016 at a health system in Northern California. Genotypic methods were used to detect carbapenemases and plasmid-encoded cephalosporinases, and mass spectrometry was used to quantify relative porin levels for OmpC and OmpF and their analogs. MICs for imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam were measured. Whole genome sequencing was used for strain typing. A carbapenemase gene encoding blaOXA-48 like, blaNDM, blaKPC, blaSME, blaIMP, and blaVIM was detected in 38.7% (24/62) of CRE isolates. Porin levels was down at least 2-fold in 91.9% (57/62) of isolates. Including carbapenemase genes and porin loss, the mechanism of resistance was identified in 95.2% (59/62) of CRE isolates. Of the carbapenemase gene-positive isolates, blaKPC -positive isolates were 100% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam; blaOXA-48 like-positive isolates were 100% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam; and blaSME-positive isolates were 100% susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. 100% (38/38), 92.1% (35/38), 89.5% (34/38), and 31.6% (12/38) of carbapenemase gene-negative CRE isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, respectively. None of the CRE strains were genetically identical. In conclusion, at this health system in Silicon Valley, carbapenemase-producing CRE occurred sporadically and were mediated by diverse mechanisms. Nucleic acid testing for blaOXA-48 like, blaNDM, blaKPC, blaIMP, and blaVIM was sufficient to distinguish between carbapenemase-producing and non-producing CRE and accurately predicted susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-relebactam.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....236afc2023c0d4e3c060daee21b6324a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/298513