Back to Search Start Over

A forward-modelling method to infer the dark matter particle mass from strong gravitational lenses

Authors :
Qiuhan He
Andrew Robertson
James Nightingale
Shaun Cole
Carlos S Frenk
Richard Massey
Aristeidis Amvrosiadis
Ran Li
Xiaoyue Cao
Amy Etherington
Source :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2022, Vol.511(2), pp.3046-3062 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
arXiv, 2020.

Abstract

A fundamental prediction of the cold dark matter (CDM) model of structure formation is the existence of a vast population of dark matter haloes extending to subsolar masses. By contrast, other dark matter models, such as a warm thermal relic (WDM), predict a cutoff in the mass function at a mass which, for popular models, lies approximately between $10^7$ and $10^{10}~{\rm M}_\odot$. We use mock observations to demonstrate the viability of a forward modelling approach to extract information about low-mass dark haloes lying along the line-of-sight to galaxy-galaxy strong lenses. This can be used to constrain the mass of a thermal relic dark matter particle, $m_\mathrm{DM}$. With 50 strong lenses at Hubble Space Telescope resolution and a maximum pixel signal-to-noise ratio of $\sim50$, the expected median 2$\sigma$ constraint for a CDM-like model (with a halo mass cutoff at $10^{7}~{\rm M}_\odot$) is $m_\mathrm{DM} > 4.10 \, \mathrm{keV}$ (50% chance of constraining $m_{\rm DM}$ to be better than 4.10 keV). If, however, the dark matter is a warm particle of $m_\mathrm{DM}=2.2 \, \mathrm{keV}$, our 'Approximate Bayesian Computation' method would result in a median estimate of $m_\mathrm{DM}$ between 1.43 and 3.21 keV. Our method can be extended to the large samples of strong lenses that will be observed by future telescopes, and could potentially rule out the standard CDM model of cosmogony. To aid future survey design, we quantify how these constraints will depend on data quality (spatial resolution and integration time) as well as on the lensing geometry (source and lens redshifts).<br />Comment: Accepted by MNRAS. Comments welcome

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2022, Vol.511(2), pp.3046-3062 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....22737b064d2dd41e613aaf879ff299d3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2010.13221