Back to Search Start Over

Rotavirus vaccine efficacy up to 2 years of age and against diverse circulating rotavirus strains in Niger: Extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Souna Garba
Ousmane Guindo
Issaka Soumana
Sheila Isanaka
Eric Adehossi
Nicole Meyer
Marie Francoise Scherrer
Brian D. Plikaytis
Rebecca F. Grais
Iza Ciglenecki
Céline Langendorf
Nathan Sayinzoga-Makombe
Monica M. McNeal
Rockyiath Makarimi
Source :
PLoS Medicine, PLoS Medicine, Vol 18, Iss 7, p e1003655 (2021)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background Rotavirus vaccination is recommended in all countries to reduce the burden of diarrhea-related morbidity and mortality in children. In resource-limited settings, rotavirus vaccination in the national immunization program has important cost implications, and evidence for protection beyond the first year of life and against the evolving variety of rotavirus strains is important. We assessed the extended and strain-specific vaccine efficacy of a heat-stable, affordable oral rotavirus vaccine (Rotasiil, Serum Institute of India, Pune, India) against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (SRVGE) among healthy infants in Niger. Methods and findings From August 2014 to November 2015, infants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3 doses of Rotasiil or placebo at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Episodes of gastroenteritis were assessed through active and passive surveillance and graded using the Vesikari score. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy of 3 doses of vaccine versus placebo against a first episode of laboratory-confirmed SRVGE (Vesikari score ≥ 11) from 28 days after dose 3, as previously reported. At the time of the primary analysis, median age was 9.8 months. In the present paper, analyses of extended efficacy were undertaken for 3 periods (28 days after dose 3 to 1 year of age, 1 to 2 years of age, and the combined period 28 days after dose 3 to 2 years of age) and by individual rotavirus G type. Among the 3,508 infants included in the per-protocol efficacy analysis (mean age at first dose 6.5 weeks; 49% male), the vaccine provided significant protection against SRVGE through the first year of life (3.96 and 9.98 cases per 100 person-years for vaccine and placebo, respectively; vaccine efficacy 60.3%, 95% CI 43.6% to 72.1%) and over the entire efficacy follow-up period up to 2 years of age (2.13 and 4.69 cases per 100 person-years for vaccine and placebo, respectively; vaccine efficacy 54.7%, 95% CI 38.1% to 66.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant in the second year of life. Up to 2 years of age, rotavirus vaccination prevented 2.56 episodes of SRVGE per 100 child-years. Estimates of efficacy against SRVGE by individual rotavirus genotype were consistent with the overall protective efficacy. Study limitations include limited generalizability to settings with administration of oral polio virus due to low concomitant administration, limited power to assess vaccine efficacy in the second year of life owing to a low number of events among older children, potential bias due to censoring of placebo children at the time of study vaccine receipt, and suboptimal adapted severity scoring based on the Vesikari score, which was designed for use in settings with high parental literacy. Conclusions Rotasiil provided protection against SRVGE in infants through an extended follow-up period of approximately 2 years. Protection was significant in the first year of life, when the disease burden and risk of death are highest, and against a changing pattern of rotavirus strains during the 2-year efficacy period. Rotavirus vaccines that are safe, effective, and protective against multiple strains represent the best hope for preventing the severe consequences of rotavirus infection, especially in resource-limited settings, where access to care may be limited. Studies such as this provide valuable information for the planning of national immunization programs and future vaccine development. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02145000.<br />Sheila Isanaka and co-workers report extended follow-up of a rotavirus vaccine trial in Niger.<br />Author summary Why was this study done? The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends rotavirus vaccine use in all countries, but several questions remain for countries that have not yet implemented rotavirus vaccination or are weighing different vaccine options. In resource-limited settings, where rotavirus vaccine delivery has important cost implications, evidence for protection beyond the first year of life and against the evolving variety of rotavirus strains is important. We previously reported on the efficacy and safety of Rotasiil (Serum Institute of India, Pune, India), a heat-stable, affordable oral rotavirus vaccine that was WHO prequalified in 2018, against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (SRVGE) among healthy infants in Niger. What did the researchers do and find? In the present analysis, we assessed the extended and strain-specific vaccine efficacy of Rotasiil in children up to 24 months of age. Rotasiil provided protection against SRVGE in infants through an extended follow-up period and against a changing pattern of rotavirus strains during the 2-year efficacy period. What do these findings mean? Vaccines that are safe, effective, and protective against multiple strains represent the best hope for preventing the severe consequences of rotavirus infection, and can be expected to greatly reduce the burden of rotavirus disease.

Details

ISSN :
15491676
Volume :
18
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....226311a8a0e1d6169507039420a5c4e0