Back to Search Start Over

Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury:Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Authors :
Ingebjørg Irgens
Jana Midelfart-Hoff
Rolf Jelnes
Marcalee Alexander
Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle
Magne Thoresen
Tiina Rekand
Source :
Irgens, I, Midelfart-Hoff, J, Jelnes, R, Alexander, M, Stanghelle, J K, Thoresen, M & Rekand, T 2022, ' Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury : Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury ', JMIR Formative Research, vol. 6, no. 4, e27692 . https://doi.org/10.2196/27692
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background Geographical, financial and travel-related barriers may impact access to necessary health care for people in need of long-term follow-up. Objective The goal of the research was to perform a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healing, interaction, and satisfaction of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and PI receiving multidisciplinary videoconference consultations from a wound clinic to the participant’s home versus regular outpatient care. The multidisciplinary team consisted of a medical doctor, a wound nurse, and an occupational therapist. In both groups, district nurses attended the consultations at the participant’s home. Methods A total of 56 participants, 28 in each group, were randomized to a videoconference group (VCG) or a regular care group (RCG). Validated questionnaires were used to measure and compare the follow-up effect on HRQoL. Percentage reduction of wound volume was measured at end of the follow-up. A Likert scale was used to measure the satisfaction of the patients and district nurses regarding the interaction between different modalities of care in the 2 groups. Results The HRQoL did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P values ranging from .09 to .88) or the rate of PI healing, experienced interaction, and satisfaction in the groups. A total of 67% (37/55) of all PIs healed, 64% (18/28) in the VCG and 70% (19/27) in the RCG. Mean reduction in ulcer volume was 79% in the VCG and 85% in the RCG (P=.32). A Kaplan-Meier plot with a logrank test regarding time to healing did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions Videoconference-based care seems to be a safe and efficient way to manage PIs in terms of HRQoL, healing, interaction, and satisfaction compared to conventional care for people with SCI. This should be considered when planning for future care. SCI has a huge impact on the individual, the family, and the health care system. There is an urgent need to improve systems of care so that individuals who live far from specialists and require long-term follow-up for conditions such as PI can get optimal treatment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02800915; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02800915 and Current Research Information System in Norway (CRISTIN) 545284; https://app.cristin.no/projects/show.jsf?id=545284

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2561326X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Irgens, I, Midelfart-Hoff, J, Jelnes, R, Alexander, M, Stanghelle, J K, Thoresen, M & Rekand, T 2022, ' Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury : Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury ', JMIR Formative Research, vol. 6, no. 4, e27692 . https://doi.org/10.2196/27692
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....222d1f8ec05cd49075a9382a8c1021d4