Back to Search Start Over

Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data

Authors :
Maurizio Buonanno
Antonello Bonfante
Giovanni Florio
Andrea Vitale
Filippo Accomando
Accomando, F.
Vitale, A.
Bonfante, A.
Buonanno, M.
Florio, G.
Source :
Sensors (Basel) 21 (2021): 1–17. doi:10.3390/s21175736, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Filippo Accomando, Andrea Vitale, Antonello Bonfante, Maurizio Buonanno, Giovanni Florio./titolo:Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data/doi:10.3390%2Fs21175736/rivista:Sensors (Basel)/anno:2021/pagina_da:1/pagina_a:17/intervallo_pagine:1–17/volume:21, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), Sensors, Vol 21, Iss 5736, p 5736 (2021), Sensors, Volume 21, Issue 17
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI), Basel, 2021.

Abstract

The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or introduce periodic data variations generated by the oscillations of the magnetometer. We studied this problem by conducting two drone-borne magnetic surveys using a prototype system based on a cesium-vapor magnetometer with a 1000 Hz sampling frequency. First, the magnetometer was fixed to the drone landing-sled (at 0.5 m from the rotors), and then it was suspended 3 m below the drone. These two configurations illustrate endmembers of the possible solutions, favoring the stability of the system during flight or the minimization of the mobile platform noise. Drone-generated noise was filtered according to a CWT analysis, and both the spectral characteristics and the modelled source parameters resulted analogously to that of a ground magnetic dataset in the same area, which were here taken as a control dataset. This study demonstrates that careful processing can return high quality drone-borne data using both flight configurations. The optimal flight solution can be chosen depending on the survey target and flight conditions.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Sensors (Basel) 21 (2021): 1–17. doi:10.3390/s21175736, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Filippo Accomando, Andrea Vitale, Antonello Bonfante, Maurizio Buonanno, Giovanni Florio./titolo:Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data/doi:10.3390%2Fs21175736/rivista:Sensors (Basel)/anno:2021/pagina_da:1/pagina_a:17/intervallo_pagine:1–17/volume:21, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), Sensors, Vol 21, Iss 5736, p 5736 (2021), Sensors, Volume 21, Issue 17
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....221a97b591ebc6a783f278083ca153e3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175736