Back to Search Start Over

How Are Clinicians Treating Children With Sepsis in Emergency Departments in Latin America?: An International Multicenter Survey

Authors :
César M Santos
Guillermo Kohn-Loncarica
Cristina Contreras-Núñez
María José Sánchez
Red de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Emergencia Pediátrica Latinoamericana
Pedro Rino
Roberto Jabornisky
Niranjan Kissoon
Javier Prego-Pettit
Ibelice R Zambrano
Sebastián González-Dambrauskas
Consuelo R Luna-Muñoz
Sérgio L Amantea
Adriana Yock-Corrales
Camilo E. Gutierrez
Sonia Viviana Pavlicich
Eugenia A Álvarez-Gálvez
Nils A Casson
Santiago Mintegi
Ana Fustiñana
Guadalupe Paniagua-Lantelli
Source :
Pediatric emergency care. 37(11)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Guidelines adherence in emergency departments (EDs) relies partly on the availability of resources to improve sepsis care and outcomes. Our objective was to assess the management of pediatric septic shock (PSS) in Latin America's EDs and to determine the impact of treatment coordinated by a pediatric emergency specialist (PEMS) versus nonpediatric emergency specialists (NPEMS) on guidelines adherence. METHODS Prospective, descriptive, and multicenter study using an electronic survey administered to PEMS and NPEMS who treat PSS in EDs in 14 Latin American countries. RESULTS We distributed 2164 surveys with a response rate of 41.5%, of which 22.5% were PEMS. Overall American College of Critical Care Medicine reported guidelines adherence was as follows: vascular access obtained in 5 minutes, 76%; fluid infusion technique, 60%; administering 40 to 60 mL/kg within 30 minutes, 32%; inotropic infusion by peripheral route, 61%; dopamine or epinephrine in cold shock, 80%; norepinephrine in warm shock, 57%; and antibiotics within 60 minutes, 82%. Between PEMS and NPEMS, the following differences were found: vascular access in 5 minutes, 87.1% versus 72.7% (P < 0.01); fluid infusion technique, 72.3% versus 55.9% (P < 0.01); administering 40 to 60 mL/kg within 30 minutes, 42% versus 29% (P < 0.01); inotropic infusion by peripheral route, 75.7% versus 56.3% (P < 0.01); dopamine or epinephrine in cold shock, 87.1% versus 77.3% (P < 0.05); norepinephrine in warm shock, 67.8% versus 54% (P < 0.01); and antibiotic administration within first 60 minutes, 90.1% versus 79.3% (P < 0.01), respectively. Good adherence criteria were followed by 24%. The main referred barrier for sepsis care was a failure in its recognition, including the lack of triage tools. CONCLUSIONS In some Latin American countries, there is variability in self-reported adherence to the evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of PSS during the first hour. The coordination by PEMS support greater adherence to these recommendations.

Details

ISSN :
15351815
Volume :
37
Issue :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pediatric emergency care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....21aa4d6b15a6b146baae79d80241d4aa