Back to Search Start Over

Axitinib after Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cancer: Preliminary Results from Italian 'Real-World' SAX Study

Authors :
Sandro Pignata
Chiara Della Pepa
Anna Crispo
Michele De Tursi
Maria Maddalena Laterza
A. Farnesi
Sabrina Chiara Cecere
Gelsomina Iovane
Emanuele Naglieri
Gaetano Facchini
Marilena Di Napoli
Giuseppe Quarto
Luca Galli
Lorenzo Calvetti
Sabrina Rossetti
Francesco Grillone
Salvatore Pisconti
Giacomo Cartenì
Carmine D'Aniello
Carla Cavaliere
Gennaro Ciliberto
Maria Giuseppa Vitale
Sisto Perdonà
Rocco De Vivo
Ferdinando De Vita
Enrico Ricevuto
Raffaele Piscitelli
Alfonso Amore
Ugo De Giorgi
Piera Maiolino
Vincenza Conteduca
Paolo Muto
Massimiliano Berretta
D'Aniello, C
Vitale, Mg
Farnesi, A
Calvetti, L
Laterza, Mm
Cavaliere, C
Della Pepa, C
Conteduca, V
Crispo, A
DE VITA, Ferdinando
Grillone, F
Ricevuto, E
De Tursi, M
De Vivo, R
Di Napoli, M
Cecere, Sc
Iovane, G
Amore, A
Piscitelli, R
Quarto, G
Pisconti, S
Ciliberto, G
Maiolino, P
Muto, P
Perdonà, S
Berretta, M
Naglieri, E
Galli, L
Cartenì, G
De Giorgi, U
Pignata, S
Facchini, G
Rossetti, S.
Source :
Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol 7 (2016), Frontiers in Pharmacology
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Frontiers Media SA, 2016.

Abstract

Axitinib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, currently approved for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of prior treatment with Sunitinib or cytokine. The present study is an Italian Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis that evaluated the outcomes of Axitinib, in second-line treatment of mRCC. The medical records of 62 patients treated with Axitinib, were retrospectively reviewed. The Progression Free Survival (PFS), the Overall Survival (OS), the Objective Response Rate (ORR), the Disease Control Rate (DCR), and the safety profile of axitinib and sunitinib–axitinib sequence, were the primary endpoint. The mPFS was 5.83 months (95% CI 3.93–7.73 months). When patients was stratified by Heng score, mPFS was 5.73, 5.83, 10.03 months according to poor, intermediate, and favorable risk group, respectively. The mOS from the start of axitinib was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.6–17.9 months); the observed ORR and DCR were 25 and 71%, respectively. When stratified patients by subgroups defined by duration of prior therapy with Sunitinib (≤ vs. >median duration), there was a statistically significant difference in mPFS with 8.9 (95% CI 4.39–13.40 months) vs. 5.46 months (95% CI 4.04–6.88 months) for patients with a median duration of Sunitinib >13.2 months. DCR and ORR to previous Sunitinib treatment was associated with longer statistically mPFS, 7.23 (95% CI 3.95–10.51 months, p = 0.01) and 8.67 (95% CI 4.0–13.33 months, p = 0.008) vs. 2.97 (95% CI 0.65–5.27 months, p = 0.01) and 2.97 months (95% CI 0.66–5.28 months, p = 0.01), respectively. Overall Axitinib at standard schedule of 5 mg bid, was well-tolerated. The most common adverse events of all grades were fatig (25.6%), hypertension (22.6%), gastro-intestinal disorders (25.9%), and hypothyroidism (16.1%). The sequence Sunitinib–Axitinib was well-tolerated without worsening in side effects, with a median OS of 34.7 months (95% CI 18.4–51.0 months). Our results are consistent with the available literature; this retrospective analysis confirms that Axitinib is effective and safe in routine clinical practice.

Details

ISSN :
16639812
Volume :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....20faa5d5d330b179d09f5db3ce0c1bff