Back to Search
Start Over
Sutureless valve and rapid deployment valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
- Source :
- Ann Cardiothorac Surg
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- AME Publishing Company, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background: The treatment of aortic valve disease is the most common valvular surgery in industrialized nations, with 3–9% of the population over the age of eighty having at least moderate aortic stenosis. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become more established, newer surgical prostheses have been developed with a variety of anchoring systems that do not rely solely on sutures to hold the valve in an appropriate position. The Edwards Intuity valve is a bovine pericardial prosthesis that is modelled on the widely implanted Perimount MagnaEase aortic prosthesis. The Perceval valve is a bovine pericardial valve attached to a self-expanding nitinol stent, which uses the radial force exerted on the patient’s aortic annulus and aortic root by the stent portion to hold the valve in position. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of comparative studies of these two valve systems. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the outcomes of rapid deployment valves (RDV) and sutureless valves (SURD) and was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and guidance. The search strategy interrogated six electronic databases. Outcomes measured included all-cause mortality at latest follow up, stroke, cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times, pacemaker implantation rates, paravalvular leak and post-operative transvalvular gradient Results: The search strategy identified 407 unique papers for initial assessment with seven studies qualifying for inclusion in the analysis. The outcomes of 4,076 patients (1,650 RDV, 2,426 SURD) were included. There was no difference in mortality, stroke or moderate or worse paravalvular regurgitation between the two groups. SURD had significantly shorter CPB time by 15.7 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.2–27.1; P=0.007] and a shorter cross-clamp time by 11.3 minutes (95% CI: 6.3–16.3; P
- Subjects :
- education.field_of_study
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
Stent
Regurgitation (circulation)
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
medicine.disease
Prosthesis
Surgery
03 medical and health sciences
Stenosis
0302 clinical medicine
030228 respiratory system
Valve replacement
Aortic valve replacement
Medicine
Systematic Review
Cardiac skeleton
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
education
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 23041021 and 2225319X
- Volume :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....20f097706ec7c4a7da191cbcd6b9f876
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2020-surd-27