Back to Search Start Over

Comparison between colour duplex sonography findings and different histological patterns of temporal artery

Authors :
Pierluigi Macchioni
Carlo Salvarani
Giulia Pazzola
G. Restuccia
Silvio Cavuto
Alberto Nicolini
Francesco Muratore
Luca Cimino
Luigi Boiardi
Nicolò Pipitone
Niccolò Possemato
Olga Addimanda
Alberto Cavazza
Mariagrazia Catanoso
Giuseppe Germanò
Muratore, Francesco
Boiardi, Luigi
Restuccia, Giovanna
Macchioni, Pierluigi
Pazzola, Giulia
Nicolini, Alberto
Germanò, Giuseppe
Possemato, Niccolò
Cavazza, Alberto
Cavuto, Silvio
Cimino, Luca
Pipitone, Nicolò
Catanoso, Mariagrazia
Addimanda, Olga
Salvarani, Carlo
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective. To assess the findings of temporal artery colour duplex sonography (CDS) in GCA characterized by a histological pattern of periadventitial small vessel vasculitis (SVV) and/or vasa vasorum vasculitis (VVV) and compare it with those observed in classic GCA with transmural vasculitis.Methods. We studied 30 patients with SVV and/or VVV, 63 patients with classic GCA and 67 biopsy-negative patients identified over a 9-year period. CDS of the temporal arteries was performed in all patients by one ultrasonographer. Temporal artery biopsy was used as the reference standard. Sensitivities, specificities and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated.Results. The frequency of the halo sign on CDS was significantly lower in the patients with SVV and/or VVV compared with those with classic GCA (20% vs 82.5%, P = 0.0001). The halo sign had a sensitivity of only 20% (95% CI 8.4, 39.1%) and a specificity of 80.6% (95% CI 68.7, 88.9%) for the diagnosis of SVV and/or VVV. The negative LR was 0.992 (CI 0.824, 1.195), and the positive LR was 1.030 (CI 0.433, 2.451). The halo sign for the diagnosis of biopsy-proven classic GCA had a higher sensitivity of 82.5% (CI 70.5, 90.5%), the same specificity of 80.6% (CI 68.7, 88.9%) and a higher positive LR (4.253; CI 2.577, 7.021).Conclusion. The halo sign is infrequently found in GCA characterized by a histological pattern of SVV and/or VVV. This limits the sensitivity of CDS in correctly identifying patients with GCA. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....20374b0d1d8237503a25e81d7925f0a4