Back to Search Start Over

The effect of intravenous, intranasal, and oral ketamine in mood disorders: A meta-analysis

Authors :
Mehala Subramaniapillai
Orly Lipsitz
Nikhita Singhal
Rodrigo B. Mansur
Jocelyn K. Tamura
Elizabeth Wong
Roger C.M. Ho
Yena Lee
Hartej Gill
Raymond W. Lam
Lee Phan
Joshua D. Rosenblat
Flora Nasri
Alexandria C. Coles
Prakash S. Masand
Roger S. McIntyre
Leanna M.W. Lui
Nelson B. Rodrigues
Michelle Iacobucci
Isabelle P. Carvalho
Amna Majeed
Source :
Journal of Affective Disorders. 276:576-584
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Ketamine is established as a rapid and effective treatment in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The availability of different formulations and routes of delivery invites the need for evaluating relative effect sizes.Effect size with respect to depression symptom reduction for each formulation and route of delivery was compared at discrete time-points (i.e., 24 h, 2-6 days, 7-20 days, 21-28 days) in adults with TRD. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect size across intravenous, intranasal and oral routes of administration. Analysis was also conducted evaluating the effect size of racemic ketamine to esketamine.The pooled effect size for intranasal ketamine/esketamine at 24 h was g = 1.247 (n = 5, 95% CI: 0.591-1.903, p 0.01). At 2-6 days, the pooled effect size for intravenous ketamine/esketamine was g = 0.949 (n = 14, 95% CI: -0.308-2.206, p = 0.139). At 7-20 days, intranasal ketamine had a pooled effect size of g = 1.018 (n = 4, 95% CI: 0.499-1.538, p 0.01). At 21-28 days, oral ketamine had a pooled effect size of g = 0.633 (n = 2, 95% CI: 0.368-0.898, p 0.01).Additional comparative studies are needed with regards to the efficacy of different formulations and routes of delivery.The short-term efficacy of intravenous and intranasal ketamine/esketamine for adults with TRD was established. Interpreting the efficacy of oral ketamine was limited by the need for studies with larger samples across independent sites. No conclusions regarding comparative efficacy of the disparate formulations and routes of delivery can be derived from this analysis. Direct comparative studies are needed to further inform treatment options for TRD.

Details

ISSN :
01650327
Volume :
276
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Affective Disorders
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1f8f3584ff5a5ebac7ad324a1e6ea434
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.050