Back to Search
Start Over
Rescue under ongoing CPR from an upper floor: evaluation of three different evacuation routes and mechanical and manual chest compressions: a manikin trial
- Source :
- Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol 28, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020), Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background If transport under ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from an upper floor is indicated, the ideal CPR-method and evacuation route is unknown hitherto. We aimed to elaborate a strategy for evacuation of patients under ongoing CPR from an upper floor, comparing three different evacuation routes and manual and mechanical chest compressions. Methods A CPR-training manikin recording CPR-quality was placed on the fifth floor and was evacuated to an ambulance via lift, turntable ladder, or staircase. Chest compressions were performed manually or with a mechanical CPR-device. Efficiency endpoints were compression depth and frequency, sufficiency of chest release, compared with European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines, and duration of the evacuation. Adverse outcomes were disconnection/dislocation of devices and hazards/accidents to the personnel. Results For all evacuation routes, compression depth and frequency were significantly more compliant with ERC-guidelines under mechanical CPR. Manual CPR was associated with considerable deviations from correct compression depth and frequency. Chest release only slightly differed between groups. Evacuation via lift under mechanical CPR was fastest and evacuation via turntable ladder under manual CPR was slowest. No device disconnections or accidents occurred, but hazard to personnel was perceived during evacuation via ladder under manual CPR. Conclusions In this study, a mechanical CPR-device proved to deliver better CPR-quality during evacuation from an upper floor. If a lift accessible with a stretcher is available, this route should be preferred, regardless of manual or mechanical CPR. Turntable ladders can only be meaningfully used with mechanical CPR, otherwise CPR-quality is poor and hazard to the personnel is increased. Not all evacuation routes may be useable in a specific real-life scenario. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Registry, www.drks.de, registration number DRKS00012885, registration date 17.08.2017.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Adolescent
Adverse outcomes
medicine.medical_treatment
education
Allied Health Personnel
Manikins
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Out of hospital cardiac arrest
Young Adult
Upper floor
health services administration
Germany
Transport under ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Rescue Work
Fifth floor
Emergency medical services
Humans
Medicine
cardiovascular diseases
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Simulation Training
health care economics and organizations
Original Research
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Fire service
business.industry
Mechanical chest compressions
lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
lcsh:RC86-88.9
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Emergency Medicine
Female
Medical emergency
business
therapeutics
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 17577241
- Volume :
- 28
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....1ec0a87462632df590ee7b27aadd5930
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-0709-0