Amietophrynus superciliaris subsp. chevalieri Mocquard 1908

Amietophrynus superciliaris chevalieri (Mocquard, 1908) Figs. 1, 2 a, 4 a, 6 a���d, 7 a, 8 a���d, 9 a���h. Bufo chevalieri Mocquard, 1908, Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris 14: 262 Type locality. ��� Ivory Coast ���. Material examined. MNHN 1908.0033 (holotype, juvenile) Ivory Coast, locality unknown; MNHN 1979.6148 - 50 (male + 2 females) Guinea, Nimba; MNHN 1980.1277 (female) Ivory Coast, locality unknown; MNHN 1989.4045 (female) Liberia, Mt. Tocadeh; MNHN 9026 (female) Guinea, locality unknown; ZFMK 31801 (male) Ghana, locality unknown; ZFMK 56292 (juvenile) Guinea, S��r��dou, For��t de Ziama; ZFMK 60724 (juvenile) Guinea, S��r��dou, For��t de Ziama; ZFMK 66282 (juvenile) Guinea, S��r��dou, For��t de Ziama; ZMB 74320 (juvenile) Guinea, D��r�� Classified Forest; ZMB 74321 (juvenile) Guinea, Di��ck�� Classified Forest; ZMB 74322 (juvenile) Guinea, Mont B��ro Classified Forest. Holotype. The holotype of Amietophrynus s. chevalieri (MNHN 1908.0033) is a juvenile (SUL: 35.8 mm) in poor condition. The skin is bleached and thinned, eyes and eyelids sunken, colouration not recognizable (neither on flanks nor on dorsum any visible pattern) and a long cut on the right flank opened the guts (Figs. 8 a, b). Nonetheless, the shape of the eyelid is recognizable. The eyelids are rounded in dorsal view and not thickened medially, thus not forming a triangular prolongation (Fig. 7 a). Skin on hand and feet are shrunken, hence, webbing between toes hardly visible (Figs. 8 c, d). Measures of characters which are accessible: head width 13.6 mm; parotid length 8.8 mm and 9.6 mm; length of first finger 4.0 mm; length of third finger 4.9 mm; femur length 12.8 mm; tibia length 12.9 mm; length of shortest toe 1.6 mm, length of inner metatarsal tubercle 0.9 mm. Diagnosis. Genetically the taxon belongs to the African toad genus Amietophrynus (Frost et al. 2006). As part of the Amietophrynus superciliaris -species complex, the taxon differs from all other members of the genus by a smooth dorsal skin in adult specimens, straight loreal region and large size. Large toad; dorsal skin smooth in adults, granular in juveniles; body shape very broad, ovoid; tympanum distinct, drop-shaped, smaller than eye diameter; parotids prominent, shape of parotids like broad drop, width of parotid glands slightly reduced posteriorly, posterior part of parotid glands rounded; eyelid rounded in dorsal view, slender in lateral view, triangular prolongation absent; posterior part of back with dark colouration, thus different from anterior part; pair of spots on posterior part of back absent; extremities slender; males with nuptial swellings on fingers I and II. A. s. chevalieri can be distinguished from the nominal subspecies by the following characters: shape of the eyelid (with the exception of few juveniles) being rounded and of equal width along the eye in A. s. chevalieri and of triangular shape and prolonged in the middle in A. s. superciliaris (Figs. 2 a, b); the eyelid width / eye diameter ratio is significantly higher in the nominal subspecies (Kruskal-Wallis-test; p A. s. chevalieri than in A. s. superciliaris; parotid glands being usually rounded at the posterior tip in A. s. chevalieri and pointed in A. s. superciliaris; posterior part of the back in A. s. chevalieri coloured darker (a triangular shaped figure, pointing cranially) than the anterior part of the dorsum, in A. s. superciliaris back of uniform colouration (generally pale yellowish); in addition, a pair of abdominal spots present in A. s. superciliaris (exceptionally lacking one or even both) and absent in A. s. chevalieri. For characters distinguishing A. s. chevalieri and A. channingi sp. nov. see below. Description. Large Amietophrynus with very broad body shape; females being larger than males (SUL in males: 116.4���137.6 mm, in females: 130.6 ���156.0 mm); mean head width similar in both sexes, in males 41 % of SUL, in females 40 %; snout in lateral view straight or marginally rounded; head without bony ridges; canthus rostralis distinct, angular; loreal region slightly concave; distance eye-snout similar to eye diameter; nares closer to snout tip than eye; eyelid in adult specimens rounded in dorsal view; eyelid of almost identical width along the eye in lateral view, without a process in the middle (only MNHN 9026 possesses a very slight angular shaped eyelid; see also Fig. 9 d); tympanum more or less distinct, positioned at the concave cheek region; tympanum vertically prolonged and drop shaped, its horizontal diameter smaller than eye-diameter; dorsal skin smooth in adults, warty in juveniles; parotid glands very prominent, drop or bean shaped, width slightly diminishing backwards, usually with rounded posterior tip (mean parotid length / parotid width ratio in males: 2.86, in females: 3.00); parotid pattern bicoloured, ventral part coloured like flanks, dorsal part like back, both colours separated by sharp angle; parotid gland openings on upper part, sometimes reaching parotid angle; fingers and toes simple, not enlarged at the end; subarticular tubercles simple; relative length of fingers: III> I> II ��� IV (mean length of finger I / length of finger III ratio in both sexes 96 %); manual webbing absent; extremities slender in comparison to body; mean tibia length 39 % of SUL in males, 37 % in females; inner and outer metatarsal tubercle present; relative toe length: IV> III> V> II> I; webbing rudimentary: 1 (0.5) or 1 (0), 2 (1 - 0.5) or 2 (1 -0), 3 (2 - 1), 4 (2.75 - 2.75) or 4 (3 - 3), 5 (1); tarsal fold absent; males in breeding condition with hypertrophied forearms and nuptial swellings on fingers I and II; juveniles with smaller and fewer warts on back than Central African specimens (R��del et al. 2004). Colouration. Dorsum pattern yellowish, extending from the tip of the snout, along the upper side of the parotids backwards to the vent region; posteriormost back region with darker marking, brownish or purple-blackish (Fig. 9); lateral colouration ranging from tip of snout, below the canthus rostralis and along the flanks to the groins: dark purple, purple-brownish or intense red colour; ventral colouration reddish; extremities dark purple; inguinal region with small spots; gular region coloured like venter; anterior extremities dark purple below; juveniles orange or light brown on dorsum; flanks in juveniles generally reddish or purple, sometimes greyish (Figs. 9 a���c, f); juveniles often with distinct white transversal bars on upper hind limbs and feet (Figs. 9 c, h); juvenile interorbital marking a single V-shaped spot (Fig. 4 a). Colouration in preservation. Preserved specimens may loose their colouration, turning brownish. However, a clear differentiation between the lateral and dorsal colouration is usually still recognizable. The darker posterior part of the back is recognizable in only few preserved specimens, as the whole back turns dark. Natural history. Amietophrynus s. chevalieri inhabits primary forests (Guib�� & Lamotte 1958; B��hme 1994; R��del et al. 2004). In contrast to A. s. superciliaris male A. s. chevalieri are known to expel loud calls during the breeding season (I. Herbinger in R��del et al. 2004). Unfortunately no recordings are available. R��del et al. (2004) report on juveniles and subadults along large rivers in primary forests in November / December in Guinea (dry season). B��hme (1994) finds freshly metamorphosed and still smooth skinned juveniles in October, at the end of the rainy season in Guinea and Hillers & R��del (2007) mention juveniles in December in Liberia. Distribution. Amietophrynus s. chevalieri (formerly usually referred to as A. superciliaris) is known from forests in Upper Guinea. At present the taxon is known from Liberia (Hillers & R��del 2007), Sierra Leone (this paper; Figs. 1; 9g); Guinea (Guib�� & Lamotte 1958; B��hme et al. 1994; R��del & Bangoura 2004 a, b; R��del et al. 2004), Ivory Coast (Mocquard 1908; Ernst et al. 2006) and Ghana (Schi��tz 1964; Hughes 1988; R��del & Agyei 2003). Bailo et al. (2009) list A. s. chevalieri (as A. superciliaris) for the Badiar National Park in northern Guinea. However, this area seems not suitable for the toad and the occurrence of the species is thus very unlikely. Other species names mentioned in this paper indicate further misidentifications. Hence, the locality has not been considered in the overall distribution (Fig. 1). According to Segniagbeto et al. (2006) the species should be deleted from the list of possible species in Togo. Amietophrynus s. chevalieri is hence a strict endemic of the Upper Guinean forest region. Taxonomy. Bufo chevalieri has been described by Mocquard (1908) from the Ivory Coast. According to Frost (2010) A. chevalieri has been synonymized with A. superciliaris by Tandy & Keith (1972) without comment. However, already Guib�� & Lamotte (1958) report that their examination of the juvenile type of A. chevalieri revealed that it corresponds to a juvenile specimen of A. superciliaris. The type of A. s. chevalieri differs from typical A. superciliaris only by the lack of the palpebral process, which however is often lacking in juveniles of the A. superciliaris -species complex (Guib�� & Lamotte 1958; this paper). The synonymy of A. chevalieri with A. superciliaris has been accepted in later publications (e.g. Perret 1966; Tandy & Keith 1972). However, the two taxa are distinctly different in morphology (see Diagnosis section above). Ethnozoology. According to B��hme (1994) locals believe the toad to be dangerous. This fear also exists in south-eastern Sierra Leone, where some people believe that this toad is evil and can kill people or at least cause disease to people who are close when it opens its mouth and exhales its evil breath. According to a widespread belief of non-related Upper Guinean ethnic groups the toad gives birth to the rainbow. These tales are known from Malink�� people in Guinea, from Oubi and Guer�� people in western Ivory Coast (R��del & Bangoura 2004 b) and from different ethnic groups in Liberia and Sierra Leone. In the latter two countries the toad is also called ���rainbow toad���.
Published as part of Barej, Michael F., Schmitz, Andreas, Menegon, Michele, Hillers, Annika, Hinkel, Harald, B��hme, Wolfgang & R��del, Mark-Oliver, 2011, Dusted off ��� the African Amietophrynus superciliaris - species complex of giant toads, pp. 1-32 in Zootaxa 2772 on pages 9-18, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.276862
{"references":["Mocquard, M. F. (1908) Description de quelques reptiles et d'un batracien nouveaux de la collection du museum. Bulletin du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, 14, 259 - 262.","Frost, D., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R. H., Haas, A., Haddad, C. F. B., de Sa, R. O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S., Raxworthy, C. J., Campbell, J. A., Blotto, B. L., Moler, P., Drewes, R. C., Nussbaum, R. A., Lynch, J. D., Green, D. M. & Wheeler, W. C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297, 1 - 291.","Guibe, J. & Lamotte, M. (1958) La reserve naturelle integrale du Mont Nimba. XII. Batraciens (sauf Arthroleptis, Phrynobatrachus et Hyperolius). Memoires de l'Institut Francais d'Afrique Noire, 53, 241 - 273.","Bohme, W. (1994) Frosche und Skinke aus dem Regenwaldgebiet Sudost-Guineas, Westafrika I. Einleitung; Pipidae, Arthroleptidae, Bufonidae. herpetofauna, 16 (92), 11 - 19.","Hillers, A. & Rodel, M. - O. (2007) The amphibians of three national forests in Liberia, West Africa. Salamandra, 43, 1 - 10.","Rodel, M. - O. & Bangoura, M. A. (2004 a) A conservation assessment of amphibians in the Foret Cassee du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, southeastern Republic of Guinea, with description of a new Amnirana species (Amphibia Anura Ranidae). Tropical Zoology, 17, 201 - 232.","Rodel, M. - O. & Bangoura, M. (2004 b) Rapid survey of amphibians and reptiles in the Foret Classee du Pic de Fon, Guinea. In: McCullough, J. (Ed.): A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Foret Classee du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, South-eastern Republic of Guinea / Une Evaluation Biologique Rapide de la Foret Classee du Pic de Fon, Chaine du Simandou, Guinee. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35, Conservation International, Washington D. C., 51 - 60 + appendices 3 - 5, 232 - 237.","Ernst, R., Linsenmair, K. E. & Rodel, M. - O. (2006) Diversity erosion beyond the species level: Dramatic loss of functional diversity after selective logging in two tropical amphibian communities. Biological Conservation, 133, 143 - 155.","Schiotz, A. (1964) A preliminary list of amphibians collected in Ghana. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening I Kobenhavn, 127, 1 - 17.","Hughes, B. (1988) Herpetology in Ghana (West Africa). British Herpetological Society Bulletin, 25, 29 - 38.","Rodel, M. - O. & Agyei, A. C. (2003) Amphibians of the Togo-Volta highlands, eastern Ghana. Salamandra, 39, 207 - 234.","Bailo, D., Alphonse, N. & Gu, Y. (2009) An inventory of biodiversity in the Badiar National Park, Guinea Conakry: Implication for conservation. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 948 - 951.","Frost, D. (2010) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.4 (8 April, 2010). Electronic Database accessible at http: // research. amnh. org / vz / herpetology / amphibia / American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.","Tandy, M. & Keith, R. (1972) Evidence from osteology. In: Blair, W. F. (Ed.) Evolution in the genus Bufo. University of Texas Press, Dallas, 119 - 170.","Perret, J. - L. (1966) Les amphibiens du Cameroun. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Abteilung fur Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere), 8, 289 - 464."]}