Back to Search Start Over

Diabetes Medications as Monotherapy or Metformin-Based Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes

Authors :
Susan Hutfless
Yue Chu
Shari Bolen
Jodi B Segal
Nisa M. Maruthur
Emmanuel Iyoha
Eva Tseng
Lisa M Wilson
Catalina Suarez-Cuervo
Zackary Berger
Source :
Annals of Internal Medicine. 164:740
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
American College of Physicians, 2016.

Abstract

Background Clinicians and patients need updated evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of diabetes medications to make informed treatment choices. Purpose To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of monotherapy (thiazolidinediones, metformin, sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT-2] inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists) and selected metformin-based combinations in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data sources English-language studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, indexed from inception through March 2015 (MEDLINE search updated through December 2015). Study selection Paired reviewers independently identified 179 trials and 25 observational studies of head-to-head monotherapy or metformin-based combinations. Data extraction Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and serially extracted data and graded the strength of evidence. Data synthesis Cardiovascular mortality was lower for metformin versus sulfonylureas; the evidence on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and microvascular complications was insufficient or of low strength. Reductions in hemoglobin A1c values were similar across monotherapies and metformin-based combinations, except that DPP-4 inhibitors had smaller effects. Body weight was reduced or maintained with metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors and increased with sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and insulin (between-group differences up to 5 kg). Hypoglycemia was more frequent with sulfonylureas. Gastrointestinal adverse events were highest with metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Genital mycotic infections were increased with SGLT-2 inhibitors. Limitation Most studies were short, with limited ability to assess rare safety and long-term clinical outcomes. Conclusion The evidence supports metformin as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes, given its relative safety and beneficial effects on hemoglobin A1c, weight, and cardiovascular mortality (compared with sulfonylureas). On the basis of less evidence, results for add-on therapies to metformin were similar to those for monotherapies. Primary funding source Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Details

ISSN :
00034819
Volume :
164
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Internal Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1e2feac8722c52e5bc4c404a07d9d514
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7326/m15-2650