Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Cure of Bacterial Conjunctivitis with Azithromycin 1%: Vehicle-Controlled, Double-Masked Clinical Trial

Authors :
Mark B, Abelson
Warren, Heller
Aron M, Shapiro
Erwin, Si
Peng, Hsu
Lyle M, Bowman
Michael, Yaros
Source :
American Journal of Ophthalmology. 145:959-965
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2008.

Abstract

To analyze the effect of azithromycin 1% ophthalmic solution in DuraSite (InSite Vision, Inc, Alameda, California, USA) on bacterial conjunctivitis.Prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group, double-masked multicenter clinical study.Eligible male or female participants with a clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial conjunctivitis were randomized to either 1% azithromycin in DuraSite or vehicle for five days. Infected eyes were dosed twice daily on days 1 and 2 and once daily on days 3 through 5. Conjunctival cultures were obtained at baseline, visit 2 (day 3 or 4), and visit 3 (day 6 or 7). The primary end point was clinical resolution of signs and symptoms (rating of zero on ocular discharge, bulbar and palpebral injection) at visit 3. Efficacy measures were clinical resolution and bacterial eradication as evaluated in the per-protocol population. Safety was assessed by adverse events, slit-lamp findings, and ophthalmoscopy.Two hundred and seventy-nine participants (n = 130, 1% azithromycin in DuraSite; n = 149, vehicle), age one to 96 years, were evaluated for efficacy. Clinical resolution with azithromycin ophthalmic solution was statistically significant compared with that of vehicle (P = .030) at visit 3. Bacterial eradication rates with azithromycin ophthalmic solution reached 88.5% at visit 3 (P.001) and included some pathogens resistant to azithromycin in vitro. Overall, adverse event rates were similar in both treatment groups.Azithromycin 1% ophthalmic solution in DuraSite showed statistically significant differences in clinical resolution and bacterial eradication rates when compared with vehicle. Because it was well tolerated in this population, it may be a viable treatment option for children and adults with bacterial conjunctivitis.

Details

ISSN :
00029394
Volume :
145
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1d923bf6db85a17f41fc0ff316d33c83
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.019