Back to Search Start Over

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Combination Therapy Compared to Ceftazidime-Avibactam Monotherapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Pathogens: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Authors :
Andrea Cortegiani
Marco Fiore
Maria Caterina Pace
Giulia Ingoglia
Sveva Di Franco
Aniello Alfieri
Vittorio Simeon
Fiore, Marco
Alfieri, Aniello
Di Franco, Sveva
Pace, Maria Caterina
Simeon, Vittorio
Ingoglia, Giulia
Cortegiani, Andrea
Fiore, M.
Alfieri, A.
Di Franco, S.
Pace, M. C.
Simeon, V.
Ingoglia, G.
Cortegiani, A.
Source :
Antibiotics, Vol 9, Iss 388, p 388 (2020), Antibiotics, Volume 9, Issue 7
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a novel beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia. The aim of this systematic review (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019128927) was to evaluate the effectiveness of CZA combination therapy versus CZA monotherapy in the treatment of severe infections. The databases included in the search, until February 12th, 2020, were MEDLINE by PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies published in peer-reviewed journals and in the English language. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (longest follow-up) evaluated in patients with the diagnosis of infection with at least one pathogen<br />secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological improvement/cure. Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis: 7 RCTs and 6 retrospective studies All the six retrospective studies identified carbapenamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) as the cause of infection and for this reason were included in the network meta-analysis (NMA)<br />the quality of the studies, assessed using the New Castle-Ottawa Scale, was moderate-high. In all the six retrospective studies included in the NMA, CZA was used in large part for off-label indications (mostly blood stream infections: 80&ndash<br />100% of patients included). No difference in mortality rate was observed in patients undergoing CZA combination therapy compared to CZA monotherapy [n = 503 patients, direct evidence OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.65&ndash<br />1.41].

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Antibiotics, Vol 9, Iss 388, p 388 (2020), Antibiotics, Volume 9, Issue 7
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1cfb1078de002648bcbf2fa8d29c71bb