Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and safety of out-of-hospital intravenous metoprolol administration in anterior ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: insights from the METOCARD-CNIC trial

Authors :
Alonso Mateos
Inés García-Lunar
José M. García-Ruiz
Gonzalo Pizarro
Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez
Pilar Huertas
Ana García-Álvarez
Leticia Fernández-Friera
Jesús Bravo
José Flores-Arias
María V. Barreiro
Luisa Chayán-Zas
Ervigio Corral
Valentín Fuster
Vicente Sánchez-Brunete
Borja Ibáñez
José Manuel García-Ruiz
Juan Valenciano
José Antonio Iglesias-Vázquez
Marta Rodríguez-Álvarez
María J. Fernández-Campos
Borja Ruiz-Mateos
Antonio Fernández-Ortiz
Agustín Albarrán
Javier Goicolea
Andrés Iñiguez
Pedro Martínez-Tenorio
Isabel Casado
Carlos Macaya
Source :
ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica, Universidad Europea (UEM)
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

We seek to examine the efficacy and safety of prereperfusion emergency medical services (EMS)–administered intravenous metoprolol in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing eventual primary angioplasty. This is a prespecified subgroup analysis of the Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction trial population, who all eventually received oral metoprolol within 12 to 24 hours. We studied patients receiving intravenous metoprolol by EMS and compared them with others treated by EMS but not receiving intravenous metoprolol. Outcomes included infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1 week, and safety by measuring the incidence of the predefined combined endpoint (composite of death, malignant ventricular arrhythmias, advanced atrioventricular block, cardiogenic shock, or reinfarction) within the first 24 hours. From the total population of the trial (N=270), 147 patients (54%) were recruited during out-of-hospital assistance and transferred to the primary angioplasty center (74 intravenous metoprolol and 73 controls). Infarct size was smaller in patients receiving intravenous metoprolol compared with controls (23.4 [SD 15.0] versus 34.0 [SD 23.7] g; adjusted difference –11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] –18.6 to –4.3). Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the intravenous metoprolol group (48.1% [SD 8.4%] versus 43.1% [SD 10.2%]; adjusted difference 5.0; 95% CI 1.6 to 8.4). Metoprolol administration did not increase the incidence of the prespecified safety combined endpoint: 6.8% versus 17.8% in controls (risk difference –11.1; 95% CI –21.5 to –0.6). Out-of-hospital administration of intravenous metoprolol by EMS within 4.5 hours of symptom onset in our subjects reduced infarct size and improved left ventricular ejection fraction with no excess of adverse events during the first 24 hours. Sin financiación 5.008 JCR (2015) Q1, 2/24 Emergency medicine UEM

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica, Universidad Europea (UEM)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1c91310f933f426fa4eb729293b1917c