Back to Search Start Over

Can environmental contamination be explained by particular traits associated with patients?

Authors :
Nathalie Bourlon
Jean-Ralph Zahar
E. Carbonnelle
Celine Lemezo
Benoit Pilmis
Typhaine Billard-Pomares
Maelyss Martin
Delphine Seytre
Christelle Saint-Marc
Christelle Clarempuy
Bactéries, Pathogènes et Santé (UBaPS)
Faculté de Pharmacie
Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)
Source :
Journal of Hospital Infection, Journal of Hospital Infection, WB Saunders, 2020, 104, pp.293-297. ⟨10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.011⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

SUMMARY Background Little is known about patient risk factors associated with environmental contamination. Aim To evaluate the rate of environmental contamination and to investigate individual risk factors. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted. Each day, five rooms occupied by patients were selected. Five critical surfaces were systematically swabbed twice a day before and after cleaning. Clinical characteristics of all patients were collected. Logisitic regression was performed to evaluate the association between environmental contamination and patients' characteristics. Findings A total of 107 consecutive patients were included and 1052 environmental samples were performed. Nineteen (18%) patients were known previously colonized/infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO). Respectively, 723 (69%) and 112 (11%) samples grew with ≥1 and >2.5 cfu/cm2 bacteria, resulting in 62 (58%) contaminated rooms. Considering positive samples with at least one pathogenic bacterium, 16 (15%) rooms were contaminated. By univariate and multivariate analysis, no variables analysed were associated with the environmental contamination. Considering contaminated rooms with >2.5 cfu/cm2, three factors were protective for environmental contamination: known MDRO carriers/infected patients (odds ratio: 0.25; 95% confidence interval: 0.09–0.72; P = 0.01), patients with urinary catheter (0.19; 0.04–0.89; P = 0.03) and hospitalization in single room (0.3; 0.15–0.6; P Conclusion This study was conducted in a non-outbreak situation and showed a low rate of environmental contamination with pathogenic bacteria. Only 11% of environmental samples grew with >2.5 cfu/cm2, and they were related to non-pathogenic bacteria. No risk factors associated with environmental contamination were identified.

Details

ISSN :
01956701
Volume :
104
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Hospital Infection
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1c898376b2dcb3de8c91da3f214afa05
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.011